From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
Cc: "Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
"Michael Hennerich" <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>, "Da Xue" <da@libre.computer>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: ad7949: use spi_is_bpw_supported()
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2025 12:40:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250614124019.114079e0@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1bbee6de-adac-4f28-9a96-fd6480691ac4@baylibre.com>
On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 12:00:27 -0500
David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> wrote:
> On 6/11/25 11:55 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 10:21:56 -0500
> > David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 6/11/25 10:15 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 10:04:58AM -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> >>>> Use spi_is_bpw_supported() instead of directly accessing spi->controller
> >>>> ->bits_per_word_mask. bits_per_word_mask may be 0, which implies that
> >>>> 8-bits-per-word is supported. spi_is_bpw_supported() takes this into
> >>>> account while spi_ctrl_mask == SPI_BPW_MASK(8) does not.
> >>>
> >>>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-spi/c8b8a963-6cef-4c9b-bfef-dab2b7bd0b0f@sirena.org.uk/
> >>>
> >>> Reported-by yourself. I'm wondering if the Closes adds a value in this case.
> >>> Otherwise I can do the same to maybe 10% of my patches, for instance. But
> >>> I don't think I put Closes tag on whatever improvement potential bug fix
> >>> I do report (read: notice) myself.
> >>
> >> I included it so that Da Xue will know that this has been resolved and
> >> doesn't need to do anything more. Normally I would have not included
> >> it though.
> >
> > If I followed the discussion correctly does this need a fixes tag?
>
> I supposed it doesn't hurt. It could be possible that someone tries to
> use an older stable kernel with a SPI controller that didn't set the
> flags, in which case there could be a problem.
>
> Fixes: 0b2a740b424e ("iio: adc: ad7949: enable use with non 14/16-bit controllers")
Applied to the fixes-togreg branch of iio.git.
I didn't mark it for stable purely because it would have been obvious
I think if anyone actually hit this.
Jonathan
>
> >
> >>
> >>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
> >>>
> >>> Code wise LGTM,
> >>> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-14 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-11 15:04 [PATCH] iio: adc: ad7949: use spi_is_bpw_supported() David Lechner
2025-06-11 15:15 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-11 15:21 ` David Lechner
2025-06-11 16:55 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-06-11 17:00 ` David Lechner
2025-06-14 11:40 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250614124019.114079e0@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=da@libre.computer \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox