From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
Cc: "Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: proximity: isl29501: use scan struct instead of array
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2025 15:04:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250713150445.3965931c@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250711-iio-use-more-iio_declare_buffer_with_ts-7-v1-1-a3f253ac2e4a@baylibre.com>
On Fri, 11 Jul 2025 11:18:13 -0500
David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> wrote:
> Replace the scan buffer array with a struct that contains a single u32
> for the data and an aligned_s64 for the timestamp. This makes it easier
> to see the intended layout of the buffer and avoids the need to manually
> calculate the number of extra elements needed for an aligned timestamp.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
Why are we using a u32 here? It's a 16 bit
read in that isl29501_register_read() call
and storagebits = 16 in the chan spec.
So to me looks like you found a bug for big endian platforms.
> ---
> drivers/iio/proximity/isl29501.c | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/isl29501.c b/drivers/iio/proximity/isl29501.c
> index d1510fe2405088adc0998e28aa9f36e0186fafae..0eed14f66ab700473af10414b25a56458335b381 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/proximity/isl29501.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/isl29501.c
> @@ -938,12 +938,15 @@ static irqreturn_t isl29501_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
> struct iio_dev *indio_dev = pf->indio_dev;
> struct isl29501_private *isl29501 = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> const unsigned long *active_mask = indio_dev->active_scan_mask;
> - u32 buffer[4] __aligned(8) = {}; /* 1x16-bit + naturally aligned ts */
> + struct {
> + u32 data;
> + aligned_s64 ts;
> + } scan;
>
> if (test_bit(ISL29501_DISTANCE_SCAN_INDEX, active_mask))
> - isl29501_register_read(isl29501, REG_DISTANCE, buffer);
> + isl29501_register_read(isl29501, REG_DISTANCE, &scan.data);
>
> - iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(indio_dev, buffer, pf->timestamp);
> + iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(indio_dev, &scan, pf->timestamp);
> iio_trigger_notify_done(indio_dev->trig);
>
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
>
> ---
> base-commit: f8f559752d573a051a984adda8d2d1464f92f954
> change-id: 20250711-iio-use-more-iio_declare_buffer_with_ts-7-880ddf1d3070
>
> Best regards,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-13 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-11 16:18 [PATCH] iio: proximity: isl29501: use scan struct instead of array David Lechner
2025-07-11 16:44 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-07-13 14:04 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-07-18 21:18 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250713150445.3965931c@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox