From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Ma Ke <make24@iscas.ac.cn>,
dlechner@baylibre.com, nuno.sa@analog.com, andy@kernel.org,
error27@gmail.com, andriy.shevchenko@intel.com,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: trigger: Fix error handling in viio_trigger_alloc
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2025 13:50:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251109135036.4c05833b@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <74993472-4845-42d5-8b50-8fa8dc5b42fa@suswa.mountain>
On Thu, 6 Nov 2025 18:16:06 +0300
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2025 at 04:29:23PM +0800, Ma Ke wrote:
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - modified the patch, thanks for developer's suggestions.
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/industrialio-trigger.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-trigger.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-trigger.c
> > index 54416a384232..9f6d30a244d9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-trigger.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-trigger.c
> > @@ -524,6 +524,7 @@ static void iio_trig_release(struct device *device)
> > CONFIG_IIO_CONSUMERS_PER_TRIGGER);
> > }
> > kfree(trig->name);
> > + mutex_destroy(&trig->pool_lock);
> > kfree(trig);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -596,8 +597,9 @@ struct iio_trigger *viio_trigger_alloc(struct device *parent,
> >
> > free_descs:
> > irq_free_descs(trig->subirq_base, CONFIG_IIO_CONSUMERS_PER_TRIGGER);
> > + trig->subirq_base = 0;
>
> This doesn't work. Do it before the goto.
This is a bit ugly however we do it. Maybe should just call
device_initialize() to hand over to the reference counted version much later?
Just before return trig seems easiest spot to reason about.
That seems nicer than doing an irq_get_chip() in iio_trig_release() to figure
out if the first part of the if (trig->subirq_base) conditional block should run or not.
Adding a flag to the trig structure just to indicate we got to running
that loop also feels annoying but at least would ensure we could just do
a put_device() in here without the other handling above.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
> > free_trig:
> > - kfree(trig);
> > + put_device(&trig->dev);
> > return NULL;
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.17.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-09 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-06 8:29 [PATCH v2] iio: trigger: Fix error handling in viio_trigger_alloc Ma Ke
2025-11-06 9:09 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-06 15:16 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-11-09 13:50 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251109135036.4c05833b@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=make24@iscas.ac.cn \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox