From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1886025E469; Sun, 7 Dec 2025 15:27:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765121274; cv=none; b=lfgfvqmUzTtVd8SjH5R/4hA0bqXDtyAiZJsHBRL5Vr4qNJ+gfPIfbLu+xDLEmZkumOMhOMXMp8gjZruwGrjV7taBguYhIXz4h+WW3RAFmHd9DIJrk0+2q2cFd5imNb7tsr0FOc1xMBsn8tzWaFbXwzxMTDTCxdVeyW4JY82FNiM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765121274; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QutVBuzh2z43sHo1wtva6NARqk1HqcJkUe0SJ2WRSKs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=rvGwIP02jm7MzPnYcYuqhQImWG5InLT6r3Kc4AMsNRYK63RqzghoJBXcvaTkNj3VFZMiK3TaK6/ExB8JNcORWDRNS4z8eOShXOlr1tRsJdD4nzb/Qj7Vy9XM6VOFFnjgXr3RS/U49LVMokJXLUQqn0CBUiDTXeBAF4R1tuEg5ho= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=XZfAK4EK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="XZfAK4EK" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 770FFC4CEFB; Sun, 7 Dec 2025 15:27:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1765121273; bh=QutVBuzh2z43sHo1wtva6NARqk1HqcJkUe0SJ2WRSKs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=XZfAK4EKjqJGPPXyy+WAPpqzETaIHWLRiXRDs+HqJJARN7eiSLKUbfWUjJ0ANybGI i9Azz85wZVmfxgPacIVkn0EwhFzk3NkoWHDpRs55fhzFqZOh5NyWJIbgqE8O5AtDIh e+wZNpt7YeQe4nrE+KoPgoglmOjnT/KvTSfHo+Fj3r12x2OWQYr+ekXVpEyyz5XvaL fnHhCwewU5+XcsuynL6WfimjBx9J/TTNURYXO7X7wak2jzRT9tzuWaqgXETQnL+m7Q q870Q1ZYkX1ptLawCcYQhp/9VsBPgWQzVjGotNrcqRmSgfCNQgJ8wb6nqUg50eoH40 iiLSg6SK1AYwQ== Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2025 15:27:44 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Francesco Lavra Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi , David Lechner , Nuno =?UTF-8?B?U8Oh?= , Andy Shevchenko , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: rework code to check for enabled events Message-ID: <20251207152744.5ec17be4@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: <20251201100018.426749-5-flavra@baylibre.com> References: <20251201100018.426749-1-flavra@baylibre.com> <20251201100018.426749-5-flavra@baylibre.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.1 (GTK 3.24.51; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 1 Dec 2025 11:00:13 +0100 Francesco Lavra wrote: > The enable_event field in struct st_lsm6dsx_hw does not lend itself well to > handling multiple event sources, so it will have to be modified to add > support for more event sources. As a preparatory step, remove references to > this field from code that does not deal with event management; rework the > st_lsm6dsx_check_events() function so that it returns whether any events > are currently enabled on a given sensor. > > Signed-off-by: Francesco Lavra > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko Applied. Note that if anyone else has more comments or wants to add tags I'm fine rebasing as appropriate until sometime after rc1 when I push out as togreg and linux-next picks it up. Thanks, Jonathan