Re: [PATCH 12/14] iio: pressure: mprls0025pa: fix interrupt flag

[Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>]

On Thu, 18 Dec 2025 13:05:54 +0200
Petre Rodan <petre.rodan@subdimension.ro> wrote:

> Interrupt falling/rising flags should only be defined in the device tree.
> 
> Fixes: 713337d9143e ("iio: pressure: Honeywell mprls0025pa pressure sensor")
> Signed-off-by: Petre Rodan <petre.rodan@subdimension.ro>
Gah. We shoudn't have let this slip through in 2023.
Some old drivers have done this for many years and for those we definitely
can't be sure there aren't boards with it set wrong in DT that will see
a regression with this fix.

For a 2023 driver, maybe we can gamble that no one has broken DT (where this
would annoyingly be a regression).  One other question below.


> ---
>  drivers/iio/pressure/mprls0025pa.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/pressure/mprls0025pa.c b/drivers/iio/pressure/mprls0025pa.c
> index 243a5717b88f..fc04988b9437 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/pressure/mprls0025pa.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/pressure/mprls0025pa.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>  #include <linux/bits.h>
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
>  #include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>  #include <linux/math64.h>
>  #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
> @@ -404,9 +405,7 @@ int mpr_common_probe(struct device *dev, const struct mpr_ops *ops, int irq)
>  
>  	if (data->irq > 0) {
>  		ret = devm_request_irq(dev, data->irq, mpr_eoc_handler,
> -				       IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING,
> -				       dev_name(dev),
> -				       data);
> +				       IRQF_ONESHOT, dev_name(dev), data);
IRQF_ONESHOT addition here needs a separate explanation. Might well be correct
but it's not related to your patch description.

>  		if (ret)
>  			return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
>  					  "request irq %d failed\n", data->irq);
>