From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5B582AD35 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2026 09:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768902650; cv=none; b=cUkZlc6U1OS3uFeVUwu5BVHzyn9GSMw1jYLYylNuh2vesegeE2BYR2wtYaX+ddyu2SxBaUdqgPgGYV2V/5Mk/UlBa3KIjr2QUI+PCd4WCajCQ3i7pYhnEdUYHKQV6zJ6Gx0xH/X7EaWAKpC0rRJtSE/eGtfk74vjCRQCfQbxEs0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768902650; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZA0s/tuoPW1D6wPLszUGgUM7+dx8qfSGeQ7YYwW5zJU=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FwS5MGM1A+1uZ0FHkp3mOfURuJkyBnOniMtGBsHeNNSzrFxYVdtaAYiY0LHiF6NT7rMcR0CDHASw+MSA0WTOB9G0/vvNdQ4Qw3PwFr1yGkdEPnxB8eQ/LnKxGXAOyABSxV3ozRyVvU6VEGHv5NL+qCH4CfwIMybSJ8s/9Rzht2k= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.224.83]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4dwMxx4GHPzHnGd6; Tue, 20 Jan 2026 17:50:13 +0800 (CST) Received: from dubpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.214.145.207]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F19540569; Tue, 20 Jan 2026 17:50:45 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.203.177.15) by dubpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.214.145.207) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Tue, 20 Jan 2026 09:50:44 +0000 Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 09:50:41 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Andy Shevchenko CC: Jonathan Cameron , , "Andy Shevchenko" , Sasha Levin , "David Lechner" , Nuno =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= , , Alexandre Belloni , Frank Li Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: ad4062: Switch from struct i3c_priv_xfer to struct i3c_xfer Message-ID: <20260120095041.0000705f@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20260119213617.745603-1-jic23@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500010.china.huawei.com (7.191.174.240) To dubpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.214.145.207) On Tue, 20 Jan 2026 09:19:47 +0200 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 09:36:17PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > commit 9904232ae30bc ("i3c: drop i3c_priv_xfer and i3c_device_do_priv_xfers()") > > Commit ? > The commit ? > > > currently in the i3c/for-next tree removes the deprecated > > struct i3c_priv_xfer and i3c_device_do_priv_xfers(). > > > > Switch to struct i3c_xfer and i3c_device_do_xfers(..., I3C_SDR) > > now rather causing a build issue when both trees are merged. > > Not sure if we need a Fixes tag. I was lazy. Both this and the original patch will go in together so low risk, but indeed it should have a fixes tag. > > > Suggested-by: Sasha Levin > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron > > > Cc: jorge.marques@analog.com > > Can we move this to be after the '---' cutter line? When I really want someone to review / test I tend to put them above the --- so that I remember to poke them if they don't and I want them to be included in any follow on threads. More FYI type +CC below the line. Mostly I just add them to the send list however rather than having a Cc at all. > > > --- > > I'm already carrying this on my tree to resolve the issue in next > > but feedback still welcome! > > The rest is fine to me. > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko Thanks for the quick response! J >