From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B46A317173; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 16:16:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777392996; cv=none; b=Oa4MCtKufaUv0KYEEmRpv5l23EXXzVT75MJZBdEDFJGU1e5P2zVsKi4v4Pg8Ix6l8OzDyfwZXeBL1WPcZ/OXu1t5YXqy9Ryjf31ztclpXiTOpA1VNeDQsgGHf/xBqwIzrOCUXoN8juWwfXwoxtpm5dDxI2660L6wzwKCEJA5GWA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777392996; c=relaxed/simple; bh=l1xfPiyMfIyDoWo6tkiJtpWxxGJUP1GcMGW1bAKwzD8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=UQwM5UHlfLSqZ0wbyi+HUfEJZgz+c2QZ6y4iaGFTu/2Sjs+RWmjGddbbwIRNCTBXqkXOXxlWdUXO9Ne0S3fXasyUroYI4RZv8a5n7DRJWTaS85UbrtHnFaEAjTvnfaET07++lUkgh30u3BGzvJBQ0ZzGfk2GrIGGX9HGfo2KFQk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=tE1usBPA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="tE1usBPA" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 94E28C2BCAF; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 16:16:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1777392995; bh=l1xfPiyMfIyDoWo6tkiJtpWxxGJUP1GcMGW1bAKwzD8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=tE1usBPAtjX6XCD0TEsnZHQojSfzwfalAcYasthWNNoR48J0sKcgykXZe/Ij/NQbY yMTLc5sjBqomBneMI9F2kUe4UVfYXjkT6QkawEGXRNyrQaVnnhjpUoCN5MYm8OMM2i ax5DaILatFElayT3qofRSrRxEF7IxxDwjgOAtoN/Sp9Nvogy9ooBXOlC/0CpdFhcHN zjAAl9SUhaIrdh9SdIuD99fcRXbp0akU6mXqM2wZFit0RnXDYEgZnLVcoGCiT1LBLf 0G1Lr4A0TeIqfJTYbxiP8bgud2sx7fM9rrVS01Qup33kMD3gf8kHvi2rgBL/Ohycxn aUoDrbwEmZTWA== Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 17:16:26 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Joshua Crofts Cc: Andy Shevchenko , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Lechner , Nuno =?UTF-8?B?U8Oh?= , Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v0 00/14] iio: magnetometer: ak8975: Additional changes to the driver Message-ID: <20260428171626.1fc178d5@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: References: <20260427201412.3067235-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.4.0 (GTK 3.24.52; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 28 Apr 2026 09:14:55 +0200 Joshua Crofts wrote: > On Tue, 28 Apr 2026 at 09:03, Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 08:37:22AM +0200, Joshua Crofts wrote: > > > On Mon, 27 Apr 2026 at 22:14, Andy Shevchenko > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > This series is an attempt to make the driver less a rabbit hole. > > > > It's a continuation of what Joshua Crofts started doing. Hence > > > > it is based on his work and first three "patches" here are supposed > > > > to be folded to his series accordingly. > > > > > > > > I have compile-tested them, but I haven't done full double check of > > > > the correctness from functional point of view. Joshua, please do that > > > > before incorporating into your series. Yes, my patches are assumed to > > > > become the part of Joshua's whatever next version of the series, that's > > > > why mine is marked as v0. > > > > > > > > Should not be taken directly by the maintainers, but any comments, review > > > > are highly appreciated. > > > > > > When you said a few changes, I didn't expect an 11-part series :). I'll go over > > > them and am them to my branch. I might check out the guard()() and chip_info > > > changes. > > > > On top of that also one may consider to switching to use reset-gpio instead of > > poking "reset" GPIO directly. But this sounds like too many for one go, let's > > make this 17 patch series go (6 yours + 11 mine). > > Fair enough, perhaps another time. > > BTW, if I'm sending your patches to the list, I should also add a Signed-off-by > tag to the end, right? > Yes. You are 'handling' the patches, so need to add your sign off.