Linux IIO development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Stepan Ionichev <sozdayvek@gmail.com>
Cc: tomasz.duszynski@octakon.com, dlechner@baylibre.com,
	nuno.sa@analog.com, andy@kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: chemical: scd30: avoid potential NULL deref in scd30_i2c_command()
Date: Thu, 7 May 2026 17:18:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260507171858.7a835306@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260506181533.409-1-sozdayvek@gmail.com>

On Wed,  6 May 2026 23:15:33 +0500
Stepan Ionichev <sozdayvek@gmail.com> wrote:

> scd30_i2c_command() takes an opaque "response" buffer plus its size.
> At the start of the function the code already checks if response is
> NULL (via the rsp local), but the response-decoding loop after the
> i2c transfer always dereferences rsp without re-checking.
> 
> With the current callers in scd30_core.c this is harmless, since
> write commands pass response=NULL together with size=0 (so the loop
> body is never entered). However, the inconsistency is an accident
> waiting to happen if a future caller passes response=NULL together
> with size > 0 -- the loop would then write through a NULL pointer.
> 
> smatch flags this:
> 
>   drivers/iio/chemical/scd30_i2c.c:104 scd30_i2c_command() error: we
>     previously assumed rsp could be null (see line 77)
> 
> Bail out early when rsp is NULL so the function is robust regardless
> of the (cmd, size) combination chosen by the caller.
> 
> No functional change for the existing callers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stepan Ionichev <sozdayvek@gmail.com>
Hi Stephan

Thanks for the analysis - as you say no actual bug here but good
to make that more obvious to static analzers.

If we ever did hit this I think it would be better to return an
error code.  I'd also do it at the top given such a combination doesn't
make sense so we should exclude it early.

if (!response && size != 0)
	return -EINVAL;


> ---
>  drivers/iio/chemical/scd30_i2c.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/chemical/scd30_i2c.c b/drivers/iio/chemical/scd30_i2c.c
> index 436df9c61..fb06bec75 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/chemical/scd30_i2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/chemical/scd30_i2c.c
> @@ -93,6 +93,9 @@ static int scd30_i2c_command(struct scd30_state *state, enum scd30_cmd cmd, u16
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> +	if (!rsp)
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	/* validate received data and strip off crc bytes */
>  	for (i = 0; i < size; i += 3) {
>  		crc = crc8(scd30_i2c_crc8_tbl, buf + i, 2, CRC8_INIT_VALUE);


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-07 16:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-06 18:15 [PATCH] iio: chemical: scd30: avoid potential NULL deref in scd30_i2c_command() Stepan Ionichev
2026-05-07 15:28 ` [PATCH v2] iio: chemical: scd30: reject (response=NULL, size>0) " Stepan Ionichev
2026-05-08  7:36   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-08  7:29     ` Stepan Ionichev
2026-05-08 16:02   ` Maxwell Doose
2026-05-08 18:16     ` Stepan Ionichev
2026-05-08 19:50       ` Maxwell Doose
2026-05-07 16:18 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260507171858.7a835306@jic23-huawei \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    --cc=sozdayvek@gmail.com \
    --cc=tomasz.duszynski@octakon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox