From: Maxwell Doose <m32285159@gmail.com>
To: jic23@kernel.org, tduszyns@gmail.com
Cc: "Joshua Crofts" <joshua.crofts1@gmail.com>,
"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org (open list:IIO SUBSYSTEM AND DRIVERS),
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH v2] iio: chemical: sps30: Replace manual locking with RAII locking
Date: Sun, 10 May 2026 16:24:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260510212427.358756-2-m32285159@gmail.com> (raw)
Replace manual mutex_lock() and mutex_unlock() calls with the much newer
guard(mutex)() and scoped_guard() macros to enable RAII patterns,
modernize the driver, and to increase readability.
Add new wrapper sps30_do_meas() for cleaner locking, and rename existing
sps30_do_meas() to __sps30_do_meas() to denote locking requirements.
Reviewed-by: Joshua Crofts <joshua.crofts1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxwell Doose <m32285159@gmail.com>
---
v2:
- Switch over some scoped_guard()s to guard(mutex)() per David's
suggestion.
- Remove redundant whitespace per Andy's suggestion.
- Add new wrapper sps30_do_meas() per Andy's suggestion (see commit
message).
- Add Joshua's RB
(link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/CAKqfh0FWig8mRR-xhvnfcFeSinR6RySyPaf9Gbpb6WU+diiiUQ@mail.gmail.com/T/#t)
drivers/iio/chemical/sps30.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/chemical/sps30.c b/drivers/iio/chemical/sps30.c
index a934bf0298dd..1c44524be1cf 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/chemical/sps30.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/chemical/sps30.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
* Copyright (c) Tomasz Duszynski <tduszyns@gmail.com>
*/
+#include <linux/cleanup.h>
#include <linux/crc8.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/i2c.h>
@@ -65,7 +66,7 @@ static s32 sps30_float_to_int_clamped(__be32 *fp)
return val * 100 + ((fraction * 100) >> shift);
}
-static int sps30_do_meas(struct sps30_state *state, s32 *data, int size)
+static int __sps30_do_meas(struct sps30_state *state, s32 *data, int size)
{
int i, ret;
@@ -87,6 +88,12 @@ static int sps30_do_meas(struct sps30_state *state, s32 *data, int size)
return 0;
}
+static int sps30_do_meas(struct sps30_state *state, s32 *data, int size)
+{
+ guard(mutex)(&state->lock);
+ return __sps30_do_meas(state, data, size);
+}
+
static int sps30_do_reset(struct sps30_state *state)
{
int ret;
@@ -111,9 +118,7 @@ static irqreturn_t sps30_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
aligned_s64 ts;
} scan;
- mutex_lock(&state->lock);
ret = sps30_do_meas(state, scan.data, ARRAY_SIZE(scan.data));
- mutex_unlock(&state->lock);
if (ret)
goto err;
@@ -136,7 +141,6 @@ static int sps30_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
case IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED:
switch (chan->type) {
case IIO_MASSCONCENTRATION:
- mutex_lock(&state->lock);
/* read up to the number of bytes actually needed */
switch (chan->channel2) {
case IIO_MOD_PM1:
@@ -152,7 +156,6 @@ static int sps30_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
ret = sps30_do_meas(state, data, 4);
break;
}
- mutex_unlock(&state->lock);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -197,9 +200,9 @@ static ssize_t start_cleaning_store(struct device *dev,
if (kstrtoint(buf, 0, &val) || val != 1)
return -EINVAL;
- mutex_lock(&state->lock);
+ guard(mutex)(&state->lock);
+
ret = state->ops->clean_fan(state);
- mutex_unlock(&state->lock);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -215,9 +218,9 @@ static ssize_t cleaning_period_show(struct device *dev,
__be32 val;
int ret;
- mutex_lock(&state->lock);
+ guard(mutex)(&state->lock);
+
ret = state->ops->read_cleaning_period(state, &val);
- mutex_unlock(&state->lock);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -238,12 +241,11 @@ static ssize_t cleaning_period_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute
(val > SPS30_AUTO_CLEANING_PERIOD_MAX))
return -EINVAL;
- mutex_lock(&state->lock);
+ guard(mutex)(&state->lock);
+
ret = state->ops->write_cleaning_period(state, cpu_to_be32(val));
- if (ret) {
- mutex_unlock(&state->lock);
+ if (ret)
return ret;
- }
msleep(20);
@@ -256,8 +258,6 @@ static ssize_t cleaning_period_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute
dev_warn(dev,
"period changed but reads will return the old value\n");
- mutex_unlock(&state->lock);
-
return len;
}
--
2.54.0
reply other threads:[~2026-05-10 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260510212427.358756-2-m32285159@gmail.com \
--to=m32285159@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=joshua.crofts1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=tduszyns@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox