From: Maxwell Doose <m32285159@gmail.com>
To: jic23@kernel.org
Cc: "Tomasz Duszynski" <tomasz.duszynski@octakon.com>,
"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org (open list:IIO SUBSYSTEM AND DRIVERS),
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH] iio: chemical: scd30: Replace manual locking with RAII locking
Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 19:26:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260515002603.19240-1-m32285159@gmail.com> (raw)
scd30_core.c currently uses manual mutex_lock() and mutex_unlock()
calls. Replace them with the newer guard(mutex)() for cleaner RAII
patterns and to improve maintainability.
In addition, minor refactors in control logic to remove gotos where the
guard(mutex)() calls would be used, and replace the "?:" operator with
regular if/else returns.
Signed-off-by: Maxwell Doose <m32285159@gmail.com>
---
drivers/iio/chemical/scd30_core.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/chemical/scd30_core.c b/drivers/iio/chemical/scd30_core.c
index a665fcb78806..a24c95874fd3 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/chemical/scd30_core.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/chemical/scd30_core.c
@@ -368,11 +368,13 @@ static ssize_t calibration_auto_enable_show(struct device *dev, struct device_at
int ret;
u16 val;
- mutex_lock(&state->lock);
- ret = scd30_command_read(state, CMD_ASC, &val);
- mutex_unlock(&state->lock);
+ guard(mutex)(&state->lock);
- return ret ?: sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", val);
+ ret = scd30_command_read(state, CMD_ASC, &val);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", val);
}
static ssize_t calibration_auto_enable_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
@@ -387,11 +389,13 @@ static ssize_t calibration_auto_enable_store(struct device *dev, struct device_a
if (ret)
return ret;
- mutex_lock(&state->lock);
- ret = scd30_command_write(state, CMD_ASC, val);
- mutex_unlock(&state->lock);
+ guard(mutex)(&state->lock);
- return ret ?: len;
+ ret = scd30_command_write(state, CMD_ASC, val);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return len;
}
static ssize_t calibration_forced_value_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
@@ -402,11 +406,13 @@ static ssize_t calibration_forced_value_show(struct device *dev, struct device_a
int ret;
u16 val;
- mutex_lock(&state->lock);
- ret = scd30_command_read(state, CMD_FRC, &val);
- mutex_unlock(&state->lock);
+ guard(mutex)(&state->lock);
- return ret ?: sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", val);
+ ret = scd30_command_read(state, CMD_FRC, &val);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", val);
}
static ssize_t calibration_forced_value_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
@@ -424,11 +430,13 @@ static ssize_t calibration_forced_value_store(struct device *dev, struct device_
if (val < SCD30_FRC_MIN_PPM || val > SCD30_FRC_MAX_PPM)
return -EINVAL;
- mutex_lock(&state->lock);
- ret = scd30_command_write(state, CMD_FRC, val);
- mutex_unlock(&state->lock);
+ guard(mutex)(&state->lock);
- return ret ?: len;
+ ret = scd30_command_write(state, CMD_FRC, val);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return len;
}
static IIO_DEVICE_ATTR_RO(sampling_frequency_available, 0);
@@ -590,19 +598,16 @@ static irqreturn_t scd30_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
} scan = { };
int ret;
- mutex_lock(&state->lock);
+ guard(mutex)(&state->lock);
+
if (!iio_trigger_using_own(indio_dev))
ret = scd30_read_poll(state);
else
ret = scd30_read_meas(state);
memcpy(scan.data, state->meas, sizeof(state->meas));
- mutex_unlock(&state->lock);
- if (ret)
- goto out;
-
- iio_push_to_buffers_with_ts(indio_dev, &scan, sizeof(scan),
- iio_get_time_ns(indio_dev));
-out:
+ if (!ret)
+ iio_push_to_buffers_with_ts(indio_dev, &scan, sizeof(scan),
+ iio_get_time_ns(indio_dev));
iio_trigger_notify_done(indio_dev->trig);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
--
2.54.0
reply other threads:[~2026-05-15 0:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260515002603.19240-1-m32285159@gmail.com \
--to=m32285159@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=tomasz.duszynski@octakon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox