From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
Cc: Md Shofiqul Islam <shofiqtest@gmail.com>,
lars@metafoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@analog.com,
nuno.sa@analog.com, andy@kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] iio: accel: adxl372: Add timestamp to FIFO data
Date: Sun, 17 May 2026 12:30:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260517123059.49570d36@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54eca584-b749-4417-b37a-40c5513b0442@baylibre.com>
On Sat, 16 May 2026 13:55:34 -0500
David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> wrote:
> On 5/10/26 3:25 AM, Md Shofiqul Islam wrote:
> > The driver pushes FIFO samples using iio_push_to_buffers() which does
> > not attach a hardware timestamp to the data. Add a scan buffer struct
> > with an aligned_s64 timestamp field to the driver state, capture a
> > single timestamp per IRQ with iio_get_time_ns(), and switch the FIFO
> > push loop to iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(). The same timestamp
> > is reused for the event push call in the same handler, replacing the
> > duplicate iio_get_time_ns() invocation there.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Md Shofiqul Islam <shofiqtest@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/accel/adxl372.c | 13 +++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/adxl372.c b/drivers/iio/accel/adxl372.c
> > index 545a21e5a3..521e8313b1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/accel/adxl372.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/adxl372.c
> > @@ -367,6 +367,10 @@ struct adxl372_state {
> > u16 watermark;
>
>
> > __be16 fifo_buf[ADXL372_FIFO_SIZE];
>
> I would just change this line to:
>
> IIO_DECLARE_BUFFER_WITH_TS(__be16, fifo_buf, ADXL372_FIFO_SIZE);
Doesn't work as timestamps are per sample and that's buffering the whole fifo.
Anyhow, fifo timestamps are hard to do and this is no where near
doing it right. Far as I'm concerned this series is dead because that complexity
isn't worth doing unless we have a user needing it and I don't think we do
yet.
Jonathan
>
> > bool peak_fifo_mode_en;
> > + struct {
> > + __be16 channels[3];
> > + aligned_s64 ts;
> > + } scan;
>
> Then we don't need the extra struct and memcpy().
>
> If we really do need the memcpy() for some reason, this struct
> can be declared on the stack instead of here.
Stack might indeed work..
>
> > struct mutex threshold_m; /* lock for threshold */
> > };
> >
> > @@ -703,13 +707,15 @@ static irqreturn_t adxl372_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
> > struct adxl372_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > u8 status1, status2;
> > u16 fifo_entries;
> > + s64 ts;
> > int i, ret;
> >
> > ret = adxl372_get_status(st, &status1, &status2, &fifo_entries);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > goto err;
> >
> > - adxl372_push_event(indio_dev, iio_get_time_ns(indio_dev), status2);
> > + ts = iio_get_time_ns(indio_dev);
> > + adxl372_push_event(indio_dev, ts, status2);
> >
> > if (st->fifo_mode != ADXL372_FIFO_BYPASSED &&
> > ADXL372_STATUS_1_FIFO_FULL(status1)) {
> > @@ -733,7 +739,10 @@ static irqreturn_t adxl372_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
> > /* filter peak detection data */
> > if (st->peak_fifo_mode_en)
> > adxl372_arrange_axis_data(st, &st->fifo_buf[i]);
> > - iio_push_to_buffers(indio_dev, &st->fifo_buf[i]);
> > + memcpy(st->scan.channels, &st->fifo_buf[i],
> > + st->fifo_set_size * sizeof(__be16));
> > + iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(indio_dev,
> > + &st->scan, ts);
> > }
> > }
> > err:
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-17 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-10 8:25 [PATCH 0/5] iio: accel: adxl3xx: Add timestamps to FIFO data Md Shofiqul Islam
2026-05-10 8:25 ` [PATCH 1/5] iio: accel: adxl372: Add timestamp " Md Shofiqul Islam
2026-05-16 18:55 ` David Lechner
2026-05-17 11:30 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2026-05-17 12:48 ` Md Shofiqul Islam
2026-05-10 8:25 ` [PATCH 2/5] iio: accel: adxl380: " Md Shofiqul Islam
2026-05-10 8:25 ` [PATCH 3/5] iio: accel: adxl367: " Md Shofiqul Islam
2026-05-10 8:25 ` [PATCH 4/5] iio: accel: adxl313: " Md Shofiqul Islam
2026-05-10 8:25 ` [PATCH 5/5] iio: accel: adxl345: " Md Shofiqul Islam
2026-05-10 12:58 ` [PATCH 0/5] iio: accel: adxl3xx: Add timestamps " Andy Shevchenko
[not found] ` <CAOTCDVsUF1qaYgSGa4hcDYOqmMpkK2G+HYeQ=ShQ1oEbM8nGJQ@mail.gmail.com>
2026-05-11 14:41 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-05-14 18:35 ` Md Shofiqul Islam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260517123059.49570d36@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=shofiqtest@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).