Linux IIO development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Joshua Crofts <joshua.crofts1@gmail.com>
Cc: Moksh Panicker <mokshpanicker.7@gmail.com>,
	nuno.sa@analog.com, Michael.Hennerich@analog.com,
	dlechner@baylibre.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] iio: adc: ad7779: Remove dead code and redundant error message
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:11:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260630001156.61ef50d9@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260628191350.583470a7@systembl0wer>

On Sun, 28 Jun 2026 19:13:50 +0200
Joshua Crofts <joshua.crofts1@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 28 Jun 2026 14:57:32 +0000
> Moksh Panicker <mokshpanicker.7@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > These two patches address review feedback from Joshua Crofts on the
> > ad7779 driver:
> > 
> > 1. Remove an unused completion field that was initialized but never 
> > waited on or signaled anywhere in the driver.
> > 
> > 2. Remove a redundant dev_err_probe() wrapper around devm_request_irq(), 
> > which already calls dev_err_probe() internally.
> > 
> > Moksh Panicker (2):
> >   iio: adc: ad7779: Remove unused completion field
> >   iio: adc: ad7779: Remove redundant dev_err_probe() after
> >     devm_request_irq()
> > 
> >  drivers/iio/adc/ad7779.c | 5 +----
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >   
> 
> You forgot to pull my Reviewed-by tags, no need to resend:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Joshua Crofts <joshua.crofts1@gmail.com>

Hi Moksh,

Generally slow down a little.  You may well have gotten
additional review on v1 if you'd waited longer and
save both a little of your time and that of reviewers.

For even a simple series like this I'd wait a few days,
or better still 1 week between early versions.  It gets
more relaxed if the code is already well reviewed and
we are just dealing with final tweaks.

Thanks,

Jonathan



  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-29 23:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-28 14:57 [PATCH v2 0/2] iio: adc: ad7779: Remove dead code and redundant error message Moksh Panicker
2026-06-28 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] iio: adc: ad7779: Remove unused completion field Moksh Panicker
2026-06-29 23:11   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-06-28 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] iio: adc: ad7779: Remove redundant dev_err_probe() after devm_request_irq() Moksh Panicker
2026-06-28 17:13 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] iio: adc: ad7779: Remove dead code and redundant error message Joshua Crofts
2026-06-29 23:11   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2026-06-30 12:43     ` Moksh Panicker
2026-06-30 12:53       ` Joshua Crofts
2026-07-01  0:16         ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260630001156.61ef50d9@jic23-huawei \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
    --cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=joshua.crofts1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mokshpanicker.7@gmail.com \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox