From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Joshua Crofts <joshua.crofts1@gmail.com>
Cc: Moksh Panicker <mokshpanicker.7@gmail.com>,
nuno.sa@analog.com, Michael.Hennerich@analog.com,
dlechner@baylibre.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] iio: adc: ad7779: Remove dead code and redundant error message
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:11:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260630001156.61ef50d9@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260628191350.583470a7@systembl0wer>
On Sun, 28 Jun 2026 19:13:50 +0200
Joshua Crofts <joshua.crofts1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jun 2026 14:57:32 +0000
> Moksh Panicker <mokshpanicker.7@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > These two patches address review feedback from Joshua Crofts on the
> > ad7779 driver:
> >
> > 1. Remove an unused completion field that was initialized but never
> > waited on or signaled anywhere in the driver.
> >
> > 2. Remove a redundant dev_err_probe() wrapper around devm_request_irq(),
> > which already calls dev_err_probe() internally.
> >
> > Moksh Panicker (2):
> > iio: adc: ad7779: Remove unused completion field
> > iio: adc: ad7779: Remove redundant dev_err_probe() after
> > devm_request_irq()
> >
> > drivers/iio/adc/ad7779.c | 5 +----
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
>
> You forgot to pull my Reviewed-by tags, no need to resend:
>
> Reviewed-by: Joshua Crofts <joshua.crofts1@gmail.com>
Hi Moksh,
Generally slow down a little. You may well have gotten
additional review on v1 if you'd waited longer and
save both a little of your time and that of reviewers.
For even a simple series like this I'd wait a few days,
or better still 1 week between early versions. It gets
more relaxed if the code is already well reviewed and
we are just dealing with final tweaks.
Thanks,
Jonathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-29 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-28 14:57 [PATCH v2 0/2] iio: adc: ad7779: Remove dead code and redundant error message Moksh Panicker
2026-06-28 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] iio: adc: ad7779: Remove unused completion field Moksh Panicker
2026-06-29 23:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-06-28 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] iio: adc: ad7779: Remove redundant dev_err_probe() after devm_request_irq() Moksh Panicker
2026-06-28 17:13 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] iio: adc: ad7779: Remove dead code and redundant error message Joshua Crofts
2026-06-29 23:11 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2026-06-30 12:43 ` Moksh Panicker
2026-06-30 12:53 ` Joshua Crofts
2026-07-01 0:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260630001156.61ef50d9@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=joshua.crofts1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mokshpanicker.7@gmail.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox