Linux IIO development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <Jean-Baptiste.Maneyrol@tdk.com>
Cc: "Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol via B4 Relay"
	<devnull+jean-baptiste.maneyrol.tdk.com@kernel.org>,
	"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
	"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
	"linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: imu: inv_icm42600: fix timestamp clock period by using lower value
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2026 23:51:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260711235132.1568bd75@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BE1P281MB1426AC573E4DFA75DE2D522FCEF12@BE1P281MB1426.DEUP281.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>

On Mon, 6 Jul 2026 08:00:43 +0000
Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <Jean-Baptiste.Maneyrol@tdk.com> wrote:

> >From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
> >Sent: Friday, July 3, 2026 21:02
> >To: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol via B4 Relay
> >Cc: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol; David Lechner; Nuno Sá; Andy Shevchenko; linux-iio@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; stable@vger.kernel.org
> >Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: imu: inv_icm42600: fix timestamp clock period by using lower value
> >
> >On Tue, 23 Jun 2026 16: 22: 15 +0200 Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol via B4 Relay <devnull+jean-baptiste. maneyrol. tdk. com@ kernel. org> wrote: > From: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jean-baptiste. maneyrol@ tdk. com> > Sorry for delay - I'm finally
> >ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
> >This Message Is From an External Sender
> >This message came from outside your organization.
> >
> >ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
> >
> >On Tue, 23 Jun 2026 16:22:15 +0200
> >Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol via B4 Relay <devnull+jean-baptiste.maneyrol.tdk.com@kernel.org> wrote:
> >  
> >> From: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jean-baptiste.maneyrol@tdk.com>
> >>  
> >Sorry for delay - I'm finally getting back on top of my emails (for IIO anyway!)
> >  
> >> Clock period value is used for computing periods of sampling. There is
> >> no need for it to be higher than the maximum odr, otherwise we are
> >> losing precision in the computation for nothing.  
> >
> >Silly question - what are the user visible results of that precision loss?
> >
> >Less accurate time stamp estimates, or something else?
> >
> >Jonathan
> >  
> Hello Jonathan,
> 
> that's not a silly question, it will effectively lead to less accurate timestamps.
> 
> We are measuring the delta time between 2 interrupts, and for abstracting the ODR
> we divide this measurement to go to the configured clock period. Then we compute timestamps by multiplying back this measured clock period. If we divide
> too much, we are losing precision. Since maximum ODR is 8kHz, there is no
> need to go further than this value. Internal chip clock is 32kHz, but maximum
> ODR is 8kHz.
> 
Seems I applied this and forgot to say so.  Anyhow, now upstream.

Jonathan

> Thanks,
> JB
> 
> >  
> >>
> >> Switch clock period value to maximum odr period (8kHz).
> >>
> >> Fixes: 0ecc363ccea7 ("iio: make invensense timestamp module generic")
> >> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> >> Signed-off-by: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jean-baptiste.maneyrol@tdk.com>  
> >
> >  
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42600/inv_icm42600_accel.c | 4 ++--
> >>  drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42600/inv_icm42600_gyro.c  | 4 ++--
> >>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42600/inv_icm42600_accel.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42600/inv_icm42600_accel.c
> >> index 532d5fdffaf8..7df920ef3cf0 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42600/inv_icm42600_accel.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42600/inv_icm42600_accel.c
> >> @@ -1170,10 +1170,10 @@ struct iio_dev *inv_icm42600_accel_init(struct inv_icm42600_state *st)
> >>       accel_st->filter = INV_ICM42600_FILTER_AVG_16X;
> >>
> >>       /*
> >> -      * clock period is 32kHz (31250ns)
> >> +      * clock period is 8kHz (125000ns)
> >>        * jitter is +/- 2% (20 per mille)
> >>        */
> >> -     ts_chip.clock_period = 31250;
> >> +     ts_chip.clock_period = 125000;
> >>       ts_chip.jitter = 20;
> >>       ts_chip.init_period = inv_icm42600_odr_to_period(st->conf.accel.odr);
> >>       inv_sensors_timestamp_init(&accel_st->ts, &ts_chip);
> >> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42600/inv_icm42600_gyro.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42600/inv_icm42600_gyro.c
> >> index 11339ddf1da3..a18dcac93929 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42600/inv_icm42600_gyro.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42600/inv_icm42600_gyro.c
> >> @@ -755,10 +755,10 @@ struct iio_dev *inv_icm42600_gyro_init(struct inv_icm42600_state *st)
> >>       }
> >>
> >>       /*
> >> -      * clock period is 32kHz (31250ns)
> >> +      * clock period is 8kHz (125000ns)
> >>        * jitter is +/- 2% (20 per mille)
> >>        */
> >> -     ts_chip.clock_period = 31250;
> >> +     ts_chip.clock_period = 125000;
> >>       ts_chip.jitter = 20;
> >>       ts_chip.init_period = inv_icm42600_odr_to_period(st->conf.accel.odr);
> >>       inv_sensors_timestamp_init(&gyro_st->ts, &ts_chip);
> >>
> >> ---
> >> base-commit: cc746297b23e89bd5df9f91f3a0ca209e8991763
> >> change-id: 20260623-inv-icm42600-fix-timestamp-clock-period-931338a848c3
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> --
> >> Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jean-baptiste.maneyrol@tdk.com>
> >>
> >  


      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-11 22:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-23 14:22 [PATCH] iio: imu: inv_icm42600: fix timestamp clock period by using lower value Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol via B4 Relay
2026-07-03 15:41 ` Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol
2026-07-03 19:02 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-07-06  8:00   ` Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol
2026-07-11 22:51     ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260711235132.1568bd75@jic23-huawei \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=Jean-Baptiste.Maneyrol@tdk.com \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=devnull+jean-baptiste.maneyrol.tdk.com@kernel.org \
    --cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox