From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48AC229BD8C; Wed, 12 Aug 2026 04:52:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786510338; cv=none; b=fC4X9+V18DWHMecqnFy19+cVSBTXqkCUxke7B3OB8nvCfABbXrrieU/rzoGPgrWJLa9IhsMUOHfTbjYNV86Iu8MRxydwZ5V8/vqeOz65w5s5V0aVt+BaX++ddVrJ2C3QLIdUy/fhhTe9paV2wBt4NKTICAeH3/CsVTH8Cn9Jjvw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786510338; c=relaxed/simple; bh=E18uZqsou2hQskz0XH8/gmSZs0TtKtUB7KnfUL81L/c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nYaEidSqpXMQwxiM++cKsZv7wJ1h4Fie3amhiEGLg2ytKL85LCaeXfA2NCm79A4WWPxUS7sMvtF2qtujuEWN/wmIVkq/m8+JMIslRsjWmkaZJjTPNDfthRJynDFAiGZn7Gq9zBdD+JfX3Cijn1iSQP6tFwIx8sTsppS1GSMyx2Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=SYO2fMu4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="SYO2fMu4" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 138811F000E9; Wed, 12 Aug 2026 04:52:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1786510337; bh=6+/13sxdSI5l7PVKZVYBy/IC5KzPDNSBnwCNr9212TI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=SYO2fMu4Q2YfFdcXx+2bDe/QASxDBfk7vaV6ou5Rn/0bLj8HwJs9X4kmR2DwEHCQR w8e3cN+2OzbovjFvkgcPHDcRaVS/bjByWrzfEJl1exyiyTc8mi+rWJwF5cCNPAvp2V Cg//2KHKZ4I2iBSloMnl8tDCuqAGhIMbYczmvnN8Gtse0njpCZH6xucfyrk04iO/yU xiP20MvZCeJuxDOjuykpylyU0fyBIAcAU82c2fGd9XBRjFBoskJqPHkciXJXTc0AlD nPhsup+5nWWgj2hiqeNbCHG6YNMpx0SLwk/R2+BIJofHH2SYrSBXfBITtWRr+ZDMMr 0Xa/ZIELU4dvw== Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 05:52:02 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Yash Suthar , David Lechner , Nuno =?UTF-8?B?U8Oh?= , Andy Shevchenko , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: accel: bmc150: use IIO_DECLARE_BUFFER_WITH_TS Message-ID: <20260812055202.1fcc271e@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: References: <20260808220236.421832-1-yashsuthar983@gmail.com> <20260809055442.434972-1-yashsuthar983@gmail.com> <20260809235934.6045eab8@jic23-huawei> <20260810001852.6afc2c2e@jic23-huawei> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.4.0 (GTK 3.24.52; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 10 Aug 2026 12:00:05 +0300 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2026 at 12:18:52AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Sun, 9 Aug 2026 23:59:34 +0100 > > Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > On Sun, 9 Aug 2026 11:24:42 +0530 > > > Yash Suthar wrote: > > ... > > > Actually no. I've backed that out. > > > > Given the data alignment is fixed, if we were going to do this it would > > be clearer as > > struct { > > s16 chans[3]; //see later, I believe this should be __le16 > > aligned_s64 timestamp; > > }; > > > > But that is very similar to the structure that follows immediately after > > this, but that has __le16 chans[] > > > > So what is going on here? > > AI slop? It's the original code I'm complaining about. Been around a while! So for once, nope (I think!) Jonathan >