From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Rishab M <rishab.madhugiri@gmail.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
dlechner@baylibre.com, nuno.sa@analog.com, andy@kernel.org,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: core: Replace BUG() with WARN_ON_ONCE() and error return
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:35:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260831003509.4fb38052@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANc32tPtHyJdg-PJa0iZHcqX4WDtMFikZFD+4aO96B1+zmf0_Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 27 Aug 2026 15:24:52 -0700
Rishab M <rishab.madhugiri@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback. I totally understand the perspective on code churn
> versus making tree wide cleanups, and I will let Jonathan make the final call
> on whether this is suitable. I've also noted the wrapping width feedback for
> commit messages in the future.
>
Please comment inline.
Anyhow, I have applied this but mostly because it is easier for cases like
this to do so than to reply to a series of folk proposing the change.
Slightly rubbish reason, but meh, too many patches floating around and this
is a harmless way to potentially cut that down a little in the longer term.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> Best,
> Rishab
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 11:41 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 09:31:40PM +0000, Rishab Madhugiri wrote:
> > > As documented in Documentation/process/deprecated.rst, the
> > > use of BUG() and BUG_ON() should be avoided as they could
> > > cause a complete system crash, preventing further debugging.
> >
> > Right, but deprecation doesn't mean the _old_ existing code must be immediately
> > changed. I leave it to Jonathan, but I see no value in this change except
> > the unneeded churn. If we ever want to drop BUG(), it should be done tree wide.
> > Hence no tag given.
> >
> > > In iio_get_time_ns() and current_timestamp_clock_show(), the
> > > clock type is already validated against supported clock
> > > types prior to these calls, making the default switch
> > > branches expected to be unreachable. Replace these with
> > > WARN_ON_ONCE(1) followed by an error return to avoid a
> > > crash and to log the highly unexpected condition.
> >
> > There is like 10+ character space on each line, the commit message shouldn't
> > be that condensed.
> >
> > --
> > With Best Regards,
> > Andy Shevchenko
> >
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-30 23:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-26 21:31 [PATCH v2] iio: core: Replace BUG() with WARN_ON_ONCE() and error return Rishab Madhugiri
2026-08-27 6:41 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-08-27 22:24 ` Rishab M
2026-08-30 23:35 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260831003509.4fb38052@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=rishab.madhugiri@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox