From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mout.web.de (mout.web.de [212.227.15.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39E5A84A3B; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 08:11:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.227.15.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718957478; cv=none; b=E5PZJXymh7b+urVQv3ikkk7ZciP6LWPFy/d5prgcg8Id8JSI5NV8weNmYeh16mNjAcPisqKTmvCEqyR6qny0nEYuN+lenTynO1IvJzn6vAOBOYUHOu+CT8SIdGw5S0i37sWOadXzxzgZSXTWwwpY1KZC+L/+FjLONnIW/sXkuyo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718957478; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tw9Hq07gA2b1Rquog4nhGifnXcTRzaS5xtVu7HsdB4A=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=iZ3SJyk/jv4lgA7eb3eZo4HAg63SIQn8MlI7z65g5VReWRoeSu70v+XjMkeX/AV1LYv1L+CsaJ9pJkQ+NmyLYgCGFh6DM1xtrkaaanAn60+EnEHorNypFZVufGPLZO/kgjA9ENNL91agVLNND5DkYEptN5rHumOg2A9n7lclq6E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=web.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=web.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=web.de header.i=markus.elfring@web.de header.b=Q7o1YAFJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.227.15.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=web.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=web.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=web.de header.i=markus.elfring@web.de header.b="Q7o1YAFJ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=web.de; s=s29768273; t=1718957433; x=1719562233; i=markus.elfring@web.de; bh=tw9Hq07gA2b1Rquog4nhGifnXcTRzaS5xtVu7HsdB4A=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc: References:From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:cc:content-transfer-encoding: content-type:date:from:message-id:mime-version:reply-to:subject: to; b=Q7o1YAFJNcGyxjEQn1AFW1H6JlsKS1YZxYyeUV3di1tL3d1IIQSN7SYr7X5QuVXM 1+F5Ezg3aJSRCEFVmtdNwUAXoVADWRKWqqxhy7r8w+RZrb7//u79RYiqzIsfTCNcZ 2/mAG8moFCw0BOCafcZOnMuquC/6rGwZUcU37eChyZQMg32Naxp3VEcBEKS7eaLIY wbsFYQf4J93BMFSIcfFfXzn8N9DeDZk4z4kCvByOntN4IQZnY8XiKZCBbl4jZWpLA J1KyHFrkuQWNlFa94f+RoA6dxunh92bO7T5fn2iFF55RLsf5D7xIsSYZE36I7aDNq 4LMmTvhdX9qLFA6C+Q== X-UI-Sender-Class: 814a7b36-bfc1-4dae-8640-3722d8ec6cd6 Received: from [192.168.178.21] ([94.31.85.95]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb005 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MzTLI-1sXxQv0YLo-017BdG; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 10:10:33 +0200 Message-ID: <302ce128-a0ef-41b4-9808-210a83bc6a48@web.de> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 10:10:29 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [RFC] Patch review challenges To: Lee Jones , lkp@intel.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org Cc: Vinod Koul , Paul Cercueil , =?UTF-8?Q?Nuno_S=C3=A1?= , =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=C3=B6nig?= , Jonathan Cameron , Lars-Peter Clausen , Sumit Semwal , oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, LKML , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet , Julia Lawall , Randy Dunlap References: <202406191014.9JAzwRV6-lkp@intel.com> <20240620170522.GU3029315@google.com> <20240621075123.GG1318296@google.com> Content-Language: en-GB From: Markus Elfring In-Reply-To: <20240621075123.GG1318296@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:nVOg+KeLl2N2fq/s0Ntj00wEVMmsfslYtciYpHyTe1/l2inQk/m WhJy/k0th8SnjtkGT3mY/stpMLVVX5brl4hVD6aV6JfozNCx+Edw9BY4QKhB751Buia3WeY WnELOdc2qE2T/SLclfYbdLxkWppv47XuhajfIUhpsbTRjFIWSqkorXBLupOF6bLWoZLH/yK TEiDwPBXPJjDX82KuPAyA== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:wqB3HsVqvPU=;8MOxyZOZkIMm6tGRBtxnuI4cxWM C2MH9F78tjLMgO6do7scFkqbR4KU6Jok6Ci5kNtCab5kNp2GKptQW07ctOCsAUccyCDBXjLeF gpDax1qUTepmbIEP4VjLz1LHGgYKvSC/jtZ0DCBKVS5Oexx0QvLjAwde48cXYcTObya/yEEH7 eAkyrC55rXP5s+IDasphuWOpyT9isIS/Z0LFL4b+iQXpz/xEZjUqraiLqTZ8itaLXufVSt1hz V06L8WgXSerY5SZeXVjuNiEJdIIfcbFlFEih0VokjSRU3JjRc5VVfnsiE/H/X34RMwf3uuNvE J3BbQN7NnXbNa5TlO4Y1tyl6rCnEqxW5Etu8Cph7dPrQaez2J9m4n6YLZ/UOwk8rHsofdVxj5 Ln2z9dJs83Qm5Co7um6reNtDHG103cnGOBoFacb+JpXYjxwvSPUg+NbsEFUqcVvMa3H0CMARJ sD99oPWaok/1HHSxxivsizHgiAn7wdlwREFe/O1UaLxv6CQnqSSnamsM821PzSgABOX6/5Iwh QCou1JsC/dKFXE7pj/BP6Ntf9Idn4u+A5dG9sYHZiZUO3CGGmlUTsy7pOeZqGsmOkRE7NoLaw /4nd2tmNSLnP5Cn//Bc26WwTGsVQtOPRzs/j3kfBtApe+yhSsKUvZ6QdJBE7A/N5lxyq7ExTQ ycRAjQUyFIwpeXpYbeNoDCLLMjVpPtcg8AZDxIx2FRYdviSUM6Wfzbz7nsIn8DFrKeR++mhBs GokAydPsde3/+knQ8w2J8nkUA2b72Hgy4EfUtL8Vs7nncRGMDivv4iwpK4erFGcM0zbhppa9f JMmNtgz/O8TPPKhKVXZb4hQWKwWCwg2cylRlwaysmztkg= > The issue is one of communication and the way reviews are conducted. > > Reviewing other people's work is challenging and requires a certain > skill-set, of which _excellent_ communication skills are non-negotiable. Patch feedback and change tolerance can vary also according to involved co= mmunities. > Why not concentrate on more complex submissions for a while and grow > your repertoire of common review points, Further collateral evolution can be considered there depending on corresponding development resources. > rather than repeating the same few over and over? Some factors are probably known also according to corresponding statistics= . Several contributors are stumbling on recurring improvement possibilities in published information. > Reading other, more experienced maintainer's reviews would also be a goo= d use > of your time. I am trying to influence adjustments in desirable directions for a while. Regards, Markus