From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f41.google.com (mail-wr1-f41.google.com [209.85.221.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B6CC397AC1 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 12:28:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.41 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768393707; cv=none; b=CPbBzNM7yiI317enYlLVBkZT4deMJSQ+M7VG+79AIKE8/7Yj3bCLeSKvv7HVKDrl1LNzZ0ew8eNUXR3aZq7HBQEmxvMQc362qBFLzrlzxx6Pdnv4jzI8Qr3reeevIclp1vN65YUc3+LkU4gv+NkTwuMiNwstrygpRpdMhN9QIlw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768393707; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QgwsHL9AbTLz5x42otaIV8gXrDTeQm0xTsamF2Jq5bU=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=h8baPZ7s/HJtCkUwnnNyjDl1n6qMKKk+BFgHiJ/M1AA5RsExzDiHr/ImhzWHBgyUj/FpJX/frdJriW69kV5343ZcO9rN6BbClwjlOCMd6+nWMkDT2JjqRHauv4CvfoiWkWxDsoXe/XoYQbQ6Dvvq4r3kSADKpvVepZI5nX94H40= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=BXGycMSC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.41 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="BXGycMSC" Received: by mail-wr1-f41.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-430f57cd471so4401051f8f.0 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 04:28:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1768393704; x=1768998504; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=PNFOqNpn1rMH4P5bAL5Hvxr+IGOQ+YxsG/76tkaFGV8=; b=BXGycMSCkZUtITJM+m44UsyX8YnXut4MOd25/39GO2QoxDrdtgZcwXjtzUgZD0m76z 4oc5gJXns8upNJfr1c/2vc673xKlvSJ1zqpWdKAfDtloJiGqxPhmMOyn+dh1hyvNEurf 40CFp5Bg9SfJ2wr0+Te7A7w+LtiV4cZdmE7FrZRH1bkIIvaBeDrUz4KhMMrsLEs8s/+J gUBJk4Dx6o1YnLBaKpFkM5u/1+Gd60fRynDk/NcGd7Jd0SJRCwkExAh5HOP4aXzvAODQ JxXztnPaIAerhZOOIKiQk3lh4tWwPRjj6z5IiOhnxePc6N8dPDuTVr43FQCgUnyuoX8T WKHQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1768393704; x=1768998504; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=PNFOqNpn1rMH4P5bAL5Hvxr+IGOQ+YxsG/76tkaFGV8=; b=tgxULVI7LP2NYiXfPxz54h0WNqAwXV1ODpbmpUYnalOEGNDfx25VWv/n3ffoJrodKu x5AJyS/NRIT1tx8HukM/UXFH48FfB/ZGA+U7FtESx+2KRKpEXmiM10g88kg+qsRH93Tz dAkDYta4pjYrNelJu50oDdq4uhhrThZRbdoCemFHI9XH5kbQnZuapB8iHzJGMdV6TcC6 QHuT7dLA+fHHOwdOnRqNBUJYvbTIAI6XzthljBqEXTU47qyECzg8emDNz/Ergn5TTW0p X699Ef5OTCj1zwJi2DBvsY+MrKUsTMSsTei21ykyFnsSXettGLAlf7ThW1cD4KASehQ+ nNnQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxM8XRl9uQyHGc7EIdk/rJ610KUCNmfGKqWyq9XKU2et+LOjMy9 U2J7SatDTxX9TwL4KeZZO+vuLTCf6J6xVCLJJ67m6AvcCs7f68ArqdFV X-Gm-Gg: AY/fxX6fb6clBXCr9y8bcDQamrGDnH/ZsQWO/OeedwmUxVpcA5owDzvQV9dI1b170kB UWw0MWNhYnbBvm0AjoucTtY9I3xwPvmQwx5BYBJB9V+GSxGQFBOvIIM874qpC6l0PGwEUVpZULK gAeZp34rhNumPskPBQPLH6rV9qN3eHmWd/5EhLV7U2drNnjEY2RmJHcFZAuozdn8c4JtaS9tUgy 6AP+mhAgXMAVN3PvQxlkjxI2bS/Dmbd4g/mLEZy7MSu4PTGitazA0hpZHVpADCt+JooUI97T9zT fY3n3trDMsWOksNQ4NVl/QkvdqslBPw4Dc6FcSrzZF8fBcuNzvUwP8tCPLG17yZEuCAWVcBCoJX B7qkdf8rLAmbnGuwjnlBtF11QEgPZ4HQdnOOnjXADk13YtYs/LZ3l/JiBN/Lgiu6rbeuxaMKg13 LSeDa3jIVQZJhI4i6XQQY= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:22ca:b0:432:8537:85ca with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-4342c554c55mr2772714f8f.50.1768393704095; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 04:28:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.187] ([161.230.67.253]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-432bd0dacc5sm49668267f8f.5.2026.01.14.04.28.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 14 Jan 2026 04:28:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <34e97dbb610e82953657d8354c0a343a9e1fa57a.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] iio: adc: ad9467: check for backend capabilities From: Nuno =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= To: Tomas Melin , Michael Hennerich , Nuno Sa , Lars-Peter Clausen , Jonathan Cameron , David Lechner , Andy Shevchenko , Olivier Moysan Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 12:29:06 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20260114-b4-ad9467-optional-backend-v3-4-d2c84979d010@vaisala.com> References: <20260114-b4-ad9467-optional-backend-v3-0-d2c84979d010@vaisala.com> <20260114-b4-ad9467-optional-backend-v3-4-d2c84979d010@vaisala.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.58.2 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Wed, 2026-01-14 at 10:45 +0000, Tomas Melin wrote: > Add capability checks for operation with backends that do not support > full set of features, but are otherwise compatible with the device. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Tomas Melin > --- > =C2=A0drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c | 11 ++++++++++- > =C2=A01 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >=20 > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c > index 9cfe66425d4e91e215cccc40e24a92c5e99e9b87..349779a049ad68b4c9f72abfc= 40154b4a3f2e095 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c > @@ -645,6 +645,9 @@ static int ad9467_backend_testmode_on(struct ad9467_s= tate *st, > =C2=A0 }; > =C2=A0 int ret; > =C2=A0 > + if (!iio_backend_has_caps(st->back, IIO_BACKEND_CAP_CALIBRATION)) > + return 0; > + > =C2=A0 ret =3D iio_backend_data_format_set(st->back, chan, &data); > =C2=A0 if (ret) > =C2=A0 return ret; > @@ -665,6 +668,9 @@ static int ad9467_backend_testmode_off(struct ad9467_= state *st, > =C2=A0 }; > =C2=A0 int ret; > =C2=A0 > + if (!iio_backend_has_caps(st->back, IIO_BACKEND_CAP_CALIBRATION)) > + return 0; > + > =C2=A0 ret =3D iio_backend_chan_disable(st->back, chan); > =C2=A0 if (ret) > =C2=A0 return ret; > @@ -807,6 +813,9 @@ static int ad9467_calibrate(struct ad9467_state *st) > =C2=A0 bool invert =3D false, stat; > =C2=A0 int ret; > =C2=A0 > + if (!iio_backend_has_caps(st->back, IIO_BACKEND_CAP_CALIBRATION)) > + return 0; > + As David suggested, it might make more sense to do the check from the calle= rs. Not as important as within the backend functions though. > =C2=A0 /* all points invalid */ > =C2=A0 bitmap_fill(st->calib_map, st->calib_map_size); > =C2=A0 > @@ -1357,7 +1366,7 @@ static int ad9467_probe(struct spi_device *spi) > =C2=A0 return ret; > =C2=A0 > =C2=A0 ret =3D devm_iio_backend_request_buffer(&spi->dev, st->back, indio= _dev); > - if (ret) > + if (ret && ret !=3D -EOPNOTSUPP) > =C2=A0 return ret; Don't agree with the above. I would prefer to see a dedicated CAP for buffe= ring otherwise I would argue why not doing the same for everything? While it mig= ht be acceptable merging IIO_BACKEND_CAP_TEST_PATTERNS and IIO_BACKEND_CAP_CAL= IBRATION (given they are related to some extent), that does not apply to buffering. - Nuno S=C3=A1