From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
Alison Schofield <amsfield22@gmail.com>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2] staging: iio: ad5933: avoid uninitialized variable in error case
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:57:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <39545e74-af9b-cd31-c525-fba9f4c369b4@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161024152226.2536749-1-arnd@arndb.de>
On 24/10/16 16:22, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The ad5933_i2c_read function returns an error code to indicate
> whether it could read data or not. However ad5933_work() ignores
> this return code and just accesses the data unconditionally,
> which gets detected by gcc as a possible bug:
>
> drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c: In function 'ad5933_work':
> drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c:649:16: warning: 'status' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>
> This adds minimal error handling so we only evaluate the
> data if it was correctly read.
>
> Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8110281/
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Looks good to me.
Lars?
> ---
> v2: handle failure for both affected reads instead of just the one
> we get a warning for
> v2: do not retry on failure to avoid looping in case of permanent
> errors
> ---
> drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c b/drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c
> index 5eecf1cb1028..3892a7470410 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c
> @@ -655,6 +655,7 @@ static void ad5933_work(struct work_struct *work)
> __be16 buf[2];
> int val[2];
> unsigned char status;
> + int ret;
>
> mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> if (st->state == AD5933_CTRL_INIT_START_FREQ) {
> @@ -662,19 +663,22 @@ static void ad5933_work(struct work_struct *work)
> ad5933_cmd(st, AD5933_CTRL_START_SWEEP);
> st->state = AD5933_CTRL_START_SWEEP;
> schedule_delayed_work(&st->work, st->poll_time_jiffies);
> - mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> - return;
> + goto out;
> }
>
> - ad5933_i2c_read(st->client, AD5933_REG_STATUS, 1, &status);
> + ret = ad5933_i2c_read(st->client, AD5933_REG_STATUS, 1, &status);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
>
> if (status & AD5933_STAT_DATA_VALID) {
> int scan_count = bitmap_weight(indio_dev->active_scan_mask,
> indio_dev->masklength);
> - ad5933_i2c_read(st->client,
> + ret = ad5933_i2c_read(st->client,
> test_bit(1, indio_dev->active_scan_mask) ?
> AD5933_REG_REAL_DATA : AD5933_REG_IMAG_DATA,
> scan_count * 2, (u8 *)buf);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
>
> if (scan_count == 2) {
> val[0] = be16_to_cpu(buf[0]);
> @@ -686,8 +690,7 @@ static void ad5933_work(struct work_struct *work)
> } else {
> /* no data available - try again later */
> schedule_delayed_work(&st->work, st->poll_time_jiffies);
> - mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> - return;
> + goto out;
> }
>
> if (status & AD5933_STAT_SWEEP_DONE) {
> @@ -700,7 +703,7 @@ static void ad5933_work(struct work_struct *work)
> ad5933_cmd(st, AD5933_CTRL_INC_FREQ);
> schedule_delayed_work(&st->work, st->poll_time_jiffies);
> }
> -
> +out:
> mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> }
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-25 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-24 15:22 [PATCH] [v2] staging: iio: ad5933: avoid uninitialized variable in error case Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-25 16:57 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2016-10-25 17:00 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2016-10-25 17:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=39545e74-af9b-cd31-c525-fba9f4c369b4@kernel.org \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=amsfield22@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).