Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 3/5] IIO: Ingenic JZ47xx: Add touchscreen mode.

[Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>]

Hi Andy,

Le ven. 17 avril 2020 à 23:59, Andy Shevchenko 
<andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> a écrit :
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:21 PM Artur Rojek <contact@artur-rojek.eu> 
> wrote:
>> 
>>  The SADC component in JZ47xx SoCs provides support for touchscreen
>>  operations (pen position and pen down pressure) in single-ended and
>>  differential modes.
>> 
>>  Of the known hardware to use this controller, GCW Zero and Anbernic 
>> RG-350
>>  utilize the touchscreen mode by having their joystick(s) attached 
>> to the
>>  X/Y positive/negative input pins.
>>  GCW Zero comes with a single joystick and is sufficiently handled 
>> with the
>>  currently implemented single-ended mode. Support for boards with two
>>  joysticks, where one is hooked up to Xn/Yn and the other to Xp/Yp 
>> channels
>>  will need to be provided in the future.
>> 
>>  The touchscreen component of SADC takes a significant time to 
>> stabilize
>>  after first receiving the clock and a delay of 50ms has been 
>> empirically
>>  proven to be a safe value before data sampling can begin.
>> 
>>  All the boards which probe this driver have the interrupt provided 
>> from
>>  devicetree, with no need to handle a case where the irq was not 
>> provided.
> 
> Device Tree
> IRQ
> 
> ...
> 
>>  +               .scan_type = {
>>  +                       .sign = 'u',
>>  +                       .realbits = 12,
> 
>>  +                       .storagebits = 16
> 
> It's slightly better to leave comma in such cases.
> 
>>  +               },
> 
>>  +               .scan_type = {
>>  +                       .sign = 'u',
>>  +                       .realbits = 12,
> 
>>  +                       .storagebits = 16
> 
> Ditto.
> 
>>  +               },
> 
> ...
> 
>>                  .indexed = 1,
>>                  .channel = INGENIC_ADC_AUX,
>>  +               .scan_index = -1
> 
> Ditto. You see above? Isn't it nice that you didn't touch that line?
> So, perhaps next developer can leverage this subtle kind of things.
> 
>>                  .indexed = 1,
>>                  .channel = INGENIC_ADC_BATTERY,
>>  +               .scan_index = -1
> 
> Ditto.
> 
>>                  .indexed = 1,
>>                  .channel = INGENIC_ADC_AUX2,
>>  +               .scan_index = -1
> 
> Ditto.
> 
> ...
> 
>>  +static int ingenic_adc_buffer_enable(struct iio_dev *iio_dev)
>>  +{
>>  +       struct ingenic_adc *adc = iio_priv(iio_dev);
>>  +
> 
>>  +       clk_enable(adc->clk);
> 
> Error check?
> 
>>  +       /* It takes significant time for the touchscreen hw to 
>> stabilize. */
>>  +       msleep(50);
>>  +       ingenic_adc_set_config(adc, JZ_ADC_REG_CFG_TOUCH_OPS_MASK,
>>  +                              JZ_ADC_REG_CFG_SAMPLE_NUM(4) |
>>  +                              JZ_ADC_REG_CFG_PULL_UP(4));
>>  +       writew(80, adc->base + JZ_ADC_REG_ADWAIT);
>>  +       writew(2, adc->base + JZ_ADC_REG_ADSAME);
> 
>>  +       writeb((u8)~JZ_ADC_IRQ_TOUCH, adc->base + JZ_ADC_REG_CTRL);
> 
> Why casting?
> 
>>  +       writel(0, adc->base + JZ_ADC_REG_ADTCH);
>>  +       ingenic_adc_enable(adc, 2, true);
>>  +
>>  +       return 0;
>>  +}
> 
>>  +       irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> 
> Before it worked w/o IRQ, here is a regression you introduced.

Before it simply did not need the IRQ, which is provided by the 
devicetree anyway. No regression here.

-Paul

> 
>>  +       if (irq < 0) {
> 
>>  +               dev_err(dev, "Failed to get irq: %d\n", irq);
> 
> Redundant message.
> 
>>  +               return irq;
>>  +       }
> 
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko