linux-iio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@linux.dev>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
Cc: "Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
	"Jean Delvare" <jdelvare@suse.com>,
	"Guenter Roeck" <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
	"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] hwmon: iio: Add alarm support
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 12:20:24 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3b35b3a7-3f1a-4401-9b60-ba4afda5636e@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aHYWQOjJEWdLjy7H@smile.fi.intel.com>

On 7/15/25 04:50, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 09:20:23PM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> Add alarm support based on IIO threshold events. The alarm is cleared on
>> read, but will be set again if the condition is still present. This is
>> detected by disabling and re-enabling the event. The same trick is done
>> when creating the attribute to detect already-triggered events.
>> 
>> The alarms are updated by an event listener. To keep the notifier call
>> chain short, we create one listener per iio device, shared across all
>> hwmon devices.
>> 
>> To avoid dynamic creation of alarms, alarms for all possible events are
>> allocated at creation. Lookup is done by a linear scan, as I expect
>> events to occur rarely. If performance becomes an issue, a binary search
>> could be done instead (or some kind of hash lookup).
> 
> ...
> 
>>  #include <linux/hwmon-sysfs.h>
> 
> + blank line here..

why?

>>  #include <linux/iio/consumer.h>
>> +#include <linux/iio/events.h>
>> +#include <linux/iio/iio.h>
>>  #include <linux/iio/types.h>
> 
> ...and here?

OK

>> +#include <uapi/linux/iio/events.h>
> 
> ...
> 
>> +static ssize_t iio_hwmon_lookup_alarm(struct iio_hwmon_listener *listener,
>> +				      u64 id)
>> +{
>> +	ssize_t i;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < listener->num_alarms; i++)
>> +		if (listener->ids[i] == id)
>> +			return i;
> 
>> +	return -1;
> 
> -ENOENT ?
> This will allow to propagate an error code to the upper layer(s).

I suppose. But I think

alarm = iio_hwmon_lookup_alarm(...);
if (alarm < 0)
	return -ENOENT;

is clearer than

alarm = iio_hwmon_lookup_alarm(...);
if (alarm < 0)
	return alarm;

because you don't have to read the definition of iio_hwmon_lookup_alarm
to determine what the return value is.

>> +}
> 
> ...
> 
>> +static int iio_hwmon_listener_callback(struct notifier_block *block,
>> +				       unsigned long action, void *data)
>> +{
>> +	struct iio_hwmon_listener *listener =
>> +		container_of(block, struct iio_hwmon_listener, block);
>> +	struct iio_event_data *ev = data;
>> +	ssize_t i;
>> +
>> +	if (action != IIO_NOTIFY_EVENT)
>> +		return NOTIFY_DONE;
>> +
>> +	i = iio_hwmon_lookup_alarm(listener, ev->id);
>> +	if (i >= 0)
>> +		set_bit(i, listener->alarms);
> 
> Do you need an atomic set?

Yes. This protects against concurrent access by iio_hwmon_read_alarm.

>> +	else
>> +		dev_warn_once(&listener->indio_dev->dev,
>> +			      "unknown event %016llx\n", ev->id);
>> +
>> +	return NOTIFY_DONE;
>> +}
> 
> ...
> 
>> +static struct iio_hwmon_listener *iio_hwmon_listener_get(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>> +{
>> +	struct iio_hwmon_listener *listener;
>> +	int err = -ENOMEM;
>> +	size_t i, j;
>> +
>> +	guard(mutex)(&iio_hwmon_listener_lock);
>> +	list_for_each_entry(listener, &iio_hwmon_listeners, list) {
>> +		if (listener->indio_dev == indio_dev) {
>> +			if (likely(listener->refcnt != UINT_MAX))
>> +				listener->refcnt++;
>> +			return listener;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	listener = kzalloc(sizeof(*listener), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!listener)
>> +		goto err_unlock;
>> +
>> +	listener->refcnt = 1;
>> +	listener->indio_dev = indio_dev;
>> +	listener->block.notifier_call = iio_hwmon_listener_callback;
>> +	for (i = 0; i < indio_dev->num_channels; i++)
>> +		listener->num_alarms += indio_dev->channels[i].num_event_specs;
>> +
>> +	listener->ids = kcalloc(listener->num_alarms, sizeof(*listener->ids),
>> +				GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	listener->alarms = bitmap_zalloc(listener->num_alarms, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!listener->ids || !listener->alarms)
>> +		goto err_listener;
>> +
>> +	i = 0;
>> +	for (j = 0; j < indio_dev->num_channels; j++) {
>> +		struct iio_chan_spec const *chan = &indio_dev->channels[j];
>> +		size_t k;
>> +
>> +		for (k = 0; k < chan->num_event_specs; k++)
>> +			listener->ids[i++] =
>> +				iio_event_id(chan, chan->event_spec[k].type,
>> +					     chan->event_spec[k].dir);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	err = iio_event_register(indio_dev, &listener->block);
>> +	if (err)
>> +		goto err_alarms;
>> +
>> +	list_add(&listener->list, &iio_hwmon_listeners);
> 
>> +	mutex_unlock(&iio_hwmon_listener_lock);
> 
> With guard() ???

Whoops. Missed that when refactoring.

>> +	return listener;
>> +
>> +err_alarms:
>> +	kfree(listener->alarms);
>> +	kfree(listener->ids);
>> +err_listener:
>> +	kfree(listener);
>> +err_unlock:
>> +	mutex_unlock(&iio_hwmon_listener_lock);
>> +	return ERR_PTR(err);
> 
> What about using __free()?

That works for listener, but not for alarms or ids.

>> +}
> 
> ...
> 
>> +static void iio_hwmon_listener_put(void *data)
>> +{
>> +	struct iio_hwmon_listener *listener = data;
>> +
>> +	scoped_guard(mutex, &iio_hwmon_listener_lock) {
>> +		if (unlikely(listener->refcnt == UINT_MAX))
>> +			return;
>> +
>> +		if (--listener->refcnt)
>> +			return;
> 
> Can the refcount_t be used with the respective APIs? Or even kref?

Why? We do all the manipulation under a mutex, so there is no point in
atomic access. Instead of the games refcnt_t has to play to try and
prevent overflow we can just check for it directly.

>> +		list_del(&listener->list);
>> +		iio_event_unregister(listener->indio_dev, &listener->block);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	kfree(listener->alarms);
>> +	kfree(listener->ids);
>> +	kfree(listener);
>> +}
> 
> ...
> 
>> +static ssize_t iio_hwmon_read_alarm(struct device *dev,
>> +				    struct device_attribute *attr,
>> +				    char *buf)
>> +{
>> +	struct iio_hwmon_alarm_attribute *sattr = to_alarm_attr(attr);
>> +	struct iio_hwmon_state *state = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +	struct iio_channel *chan = &state->channels[sattr->index];
>> +
>> +	if (test_and_clear_bit(sattr->alarm, sattr->listener->alarms)) {
>> +		u64 id = sattr->listener->ids[sattr->alarm];
>> +		enum iio_event_direction dir = IIO_EVENT_CODE_EXTRACT_DIR(id);
>> +
>> +		WARN_ON(iio_hwmon_alarm_toggle(chan, dir));
> 
>> +		strcpy(buf, "1\n");
>> +		return 2;
> 
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	strcpy(buf, "0\n");
>> +	return 2;
> 
> Better to assign the value and
>
> 	return sysfs_emit(...);
> 
> which will make even easier to recognize that this is supplied to user via
> sysfs.

:l

the things we do to avoid memcpy...

--Sean

>> +}
> 
> ...
> 
>> +static int add_alarm_attr(struct device *dev, struct iio_hwmon_state *st,
>> +			  int i, enum iio_event_direction dir,
>> +			  const char *fmt, ...)
> 
> Same comments as per previous patches.
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-15 16:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-15  1:20 [PATCH 0/7] hwmon: iio: Add alarm support Sean Anderson
2025-07-15  1:20 ` [PATCH 1/7] math64: Add div64_s64_rem Sean Anderson
2025-07-15  8:03   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-07-15 17:36     ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-16 10:15       ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-07-15  1:20 ` [PATCH 2/7] iio: inkern: Add API for reading/writing events Sean Anderson
2025-07-15  8:18   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-07-15 15:42     ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-16  9:28       ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-07-17 16:42         ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-27 15:55           ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-15 10:35   ` Nuno Sá
2025-07-15 15:43     ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-16  6:23       ` Nuno Sá
2025-07-27 16:13   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-15  1:20 ` [PATCH 3/7] iio: Add in-kernel API for events Sean Anderson
2025-07-15  8:20   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-07-15 15:47     ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-16  9:47       ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-07-15 11:09   ` Nuno Sá
2025-07-15 16:52     ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-27 16:21       ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-28 22:44         ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-29 18:33           ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-29 20:09             ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-31 12:59               ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-27 16:24   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-15  1:20 ` [PATCH 4/7] hwmon: iio: Refactor scale calculation into helper Sean Anderson
2025-07-15  8:35   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-07-15  1:20 ` [PATCH 5/7] hwmon: iio: Add helper function for creating attributes Sean Anderson
2025-07-15  8:38   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-07-15 15:55     ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-16 10:00       ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-07-27 16:31   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-15  1:20 ` [PATCH 6/7] hwmon: iio: Add min/max support Sean Anderson
2025-07-15  8:41   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-07-15 16:05     ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-16 10:01       ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-07-17 16:11         ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-27 16:35   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-28 22:32     ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-29 18:37       ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-15  1:20 ` [PATCH 7/7] hwmon: iio: Add alarm support Sean Anderson
2025-07-15  8:50   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-07-15 16:20     ` Sean Anderson [this message]
2025-07-16 10:08       ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-07-17 16:23         ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-21  7:42           ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-07-21 14:24             ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-15 11:28   ` Nuno Sá
2025-07-15 17:02     ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-15 19:26       ` Guenter Roeck
2025-07-15 19:40         ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-16  6:37       ` Nuno Sá
2025-07-17 16:00         ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-31 10:52           ` Nuno Sá
2025-08-02 10:53             ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-15 16:13   ` kernel test robot
2025-07-15 19:34   ` Guenter Roeck
2025-07-15 20:08     ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-16  7:44   ` kernel test robot
2025-07-27 16:50   ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3b35b3a7-3f1a-4401-9b60-ba4afda5636e@linux.dev \
    --to=sean.anderson@linux.dev \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).