From: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@linux.dev>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
Cc: "Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
"Jean Delvare" <jdelvare@suse.com>,
"Guenter Roeck" <linux@roeck-us.net>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] hwmon: iio: Add alarm support
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 12:20:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3b35b3a7-3f1a-4401-9b60-ba4afda5636e@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aHYWQOjJEWdLjy7H@smile.fi.intel.com>
On 7/15/25 04:50, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 09:20:23PM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> Add alarm support based on IIO threshold events. The alarm is cleared on
>> read, but will be set again if the condition is still present. This is
>> detected by disabling and re-enabling the event. The same trick is done
>> when creating the attribute to detect already-triggered events.
>>
>> The alarms are updated by an event listener. To keep the notifier call
>> chain short, we create one listener per iio device, shared across all
>> hwmon devices.
>>
>> To avoid dynamic creation of alarms, alarms for all possible events are
>> allocated at creation. Lookup is done by a linear scan, as I expect
>> events to occur rarely. If performance becomes an issue, a binary search
>> could be done instead (or some kind of hash lookup).
>
> ...
>
>> #include <linux/hwmon-sysfs.h>
>
> + blank line here..
why?
>> #include <linux/iio/consumer.h>
>> +#include <linux/iio/events.h>
>> +#include <linux/iio/iio.h>
>> #include <linux/iio/types.h>
>
> ...and here?
OK
>> +#include <uapi/linux/iio/events.h>
>
> ...
>
>> +static ssize_t iio_hwmon_lookup_alarm(struct iio_hwmon_listener *listener,
>> + u64 id)
>> +{
>> + ssize_t i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < listener->num_alarms; i++)
>> + if (listener->ids[i] == id)
>> + return i;
>
>> + return -1;
>
> -ENOENT ?
> This will allow to propagate an error code to the upper layer(s).
I suppose. But I think
alarm = iio_hwmon_lookup_alarm(...);
if (alarm < 0)
return -ENOENT;
is clearer than
alarm = iio_hwmon_lookup_alarm(...);
if (alarm < 0)
return alarm;
because you don't have to read the definition of iio_hwmon_lookup_alarm
to determine what the return value is.
>> +}
>
> ...
>
>> +static int iio_hwmon_listener_callback(struct notifier_block *block,
>> + unsigned long action, void *data)
>> +{
>> + struct iio_hwmon_listener *listener =
>> + container_of(block, struct iio_hwmon_listener, block);
>> + struct iio_event_data *ev = data;
>> + ssize_t i;
>> +
>> + if (action != IIO_NOTIFY_EVENT)
>> + return NOTIFY_DONE;
>> +
>> + i = iio_hwmon_lookup_alarm(listener, ev->id);
>> + if (i >= 0)
>> + set_bit(i, listener->alarms);
>
> Do you need an atomic set?
Yes. This protects against concurrent access by iio_hwmon_read_alarm.
>> + else
>> + dev_warn_once(&listener->indio_dev->dev,
>> + "unknown event %016llx\n", ev->id);
>> +
>> + return NOTIFY_DONE;
>> +}
>
> ...
>
>> +static struct iio_hwmon_listener *iio_hwmon_listener_get(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>> +{
>> + struct iio_hwmon_listener *listener;
>> + int err = -ENOMEM;
>> + size_t i, j;
>> +
>> + guard(mutex)(&iio_hwmon_listener_lock);
>> + list_for_each_entry(listener, &iio_hwmon_listeners, list) {
>> + if (listener->indio_dev == indio_dev) {
>> + if (likely(listener->refcnt != UINT_MAX))
>> + listener->refcnt++;
>> + return listener;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + listener = kzalloc(sizeof(*listener), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!listener)
>> + goto err_unlock;
>> +
>> + listener->refcnt = 1;
>> + listener->indio_dev = indio_dev;
>> + listener->block.notifier_call = iio_hwmon_listener_callback;
>> + for (i = 0; i < indio_dev->num_channels; i++)
>> + listener->num_alarms += indio_dev->channels[i].num_event_specs;
>> +
>> + listener->ids = kcalloc(listener->num_alarms, sizeof(*listener->ids),
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + listener->alarms = bitmap_zalloc(listener->num_alarms, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!listener->ids || !listener->alarms)
>> + goto err_listener;
>> +
>> + i = 0;
>> + for (j = 0; j < indio_dev->num_channels; j++) {
>> + struct iio_chan_spec const *chan = &indio_dev->channels[j];
>> + size_t k;
>> +
>> + for (k = 0; k < chan->num_event_specs; k++)
>> + listener->ids[i++] =
>> + iio_event_id(chan, chan->event_spec[k].type,
>> + chan->event_spec[k].dir);
>> + }
>> +
>> + err = iio_event_register(indio_dev, &listener->block);
>> + if (err)
>> + goto err_alarms;
>> +
>> + list_add(&listener->list, &iio_hwmon_listeners);
>
>> + mutex_unlock(&iio_hwmon_listener_lock);
>
> With guard() ???
Whoops. Missed that when refactoring.
>> + return listener;
>> +
>> +err_alarms:
>> + kfree(listener->alarms);
>> + kfree(listener->ids);
>> +err_listener:
>> + kfree(listener);
>> +err_unlock:
>> + mutex_unlock(&iio_hwmon_listener_lock);
>> + return ERR_PTR(err);
>
> What about using __free()?
That works for listener, but not for alarms or ids.
>> +}
>
> ...
>
>> +static void iio_hwmon_listener_put(void *data)
>> +{
>> + struct iio_hwmon_listener *listener = data;
>> +
>> + scoped_guard(mutex, &iio_hwmon_listener_lock) {
>> + if (unlikely(listener->refcnt == UINT_MAX))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + if (--listener->refcnt)
>> + return;
>
> Can the refcount_t be used with the respective APIs? Or even kref?
Why? We do all the manipulation under a mutex, so there is no point in
atomic access. Instead of the games refcnt_t has to play to try and
prevent overflow we can just check for it directly.
>> + list_del(&listener->list);
>> + iio_event_unregister(listener->indio_dev, &listener->block);
>> + }
>> +
>> + kfree(listener->alarms);
>> + kfree(listener->ids);
>> + kfree(listener);
>> +}
>
> ...
>
>> +static ssize_t iio_hwmon_read_alarm(struct device *dev,
>> + struct device_attribute *attr,
>> + char *buf)
>> +{
>> + struct iio_hwmon_alarm_attribute *sattr = to_alarm_attr(attr);
>> + struct iio_hwmon_state *state = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> + struct iio_channel *chan = &state->channels[sattr->index];
>> +
>> + if (test_and_clear_bit(sattr->alarm, sattr->listener->alarms)) {
>> + u64 id = sattr->listener->ids[sattr->alarm];
>> + enum iio_event_direction dir = IIO_EVENT_CODE_EXTRACT_DIR(id);
>> +
>> + WARN_ON(iio_hwmon_alarm_toggle(chan, dir));
>
>> + strcpy(buf, "1\n");
>> + return 2;
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + strcpy(buf, "0\n");
>> + return 2;
>
> Better to assign the value and
>
> return sysfs_emit(...);
>
> which will make even easier to recognize that this is supplied to user via
> sysfs.
:l
the things we do to avoid memcpy...
--Sean
>> +}
>
> ...
>
>> +static int add_alarm_attr(struct device *dev, struct iio_hwmon_state *st,
>> + int i, enum iio_event_direction dir,
>> + const char *fmt, ...)
>
> Same comments as per previous patches.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-15 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-15 1:20 [PATCH 0/7] hwmon: iio: Add alarm support Sean Anderson
2025-07-15 1:20 ` [PATCH 1/7] math64: Add div64_s64_rem Sean Anderson
2025-07-15 8:03 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-07-15 17:36 ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-16 10:15 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-07-15 1:20 ` [PATCH 2/7] iio: inkern: Add API for reading/writing events Sean Anderson
2025-07-15 8:18 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-07-15 15:42 ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-16 9:28 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-07-17 16:42 ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-27 15:55 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-15 10:35 ` Nuno Sá
2025-07-15 15:43 ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-16 6:23 ` Nuno Sá
2025-07-27 16:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-15 1:20 ` [PATCH 3/7] iio: Add in-kernel API for events Sean Anderson
2025-07-15 8:20 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-07-15 15:47 ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-16 9:47 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-07-15 11:09 ` Nuno Sá
2025-07-15 16:52 ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-27 16:21 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-28 22:44 ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-29 18:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-29 20:09 ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-31 12:59 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-27 16:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-15 1:20 ` [PATCH 4/7] hwmon: iio: Refactor scale calculation into helper Sean Anderson
2025-07-15 8:35 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-07-15 1:20 ` [PATCH 5/7] hwmon: iio: Add helper function for creating attributes Sean Anderson
2025-07-15 8:38 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-07-15 15:55 ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-16 10:00 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-07-27 16:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-15 1:20 ` [PATCH 6/7] hwmon: iio: Add min/max support Sean Anderson
2025-07-15 8:41 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-07-15 16:05 ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-16 10:01 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-07-17 16:11 ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-27 16:35 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-28 22:32 ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-29 18:37 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-15 1:20 ` [PATCH 7/7] hwmon: iio: Add alarm support Sean Anderson
2025-07-15 8:50 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-07-15 16:20 ` Sean Anderson [this message]
2025-07-16 10:08 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-07-17 16:23 ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-21 7:42 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-07-21 14:24 ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-15 11:28 ` Nuno Sá
2025-07-15 17:02 ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-15 19:26 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-07-15 19:40 ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-16 6:37 ` Nuno Sá
2025-07-17 16:00 ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-31 10:52 ` Nuno Sá
2025-08-02 10:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-15 16:13 ` kernel test robot
2025-07-15 19:34 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-07-15 20:08 ` Sean Anderson
2025-07-16 7:44 ` kernel test robot
2025-07-27 16:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3b35b3a7-3f1a-4401-9b60-ba4afda5636e@linux.dev \
--to=sean.anderson@linux.dev \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).