From: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
To: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>,
Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: iio: dac: ad5624r_spi.c - use of scan_type
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 10:38:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3f5ff01b-8c32-423f-b3cc-a95399b69399@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi dee Ho peeps,
I started drafting a driver for a ROHM DAC. I took a quick look at the
ad5624r_spi.c, and the use of the 'scan_type' -field in the struct
iio_chan_spec puzzled me.
I think this field is used by the driver to convert the data from user
to register format while performing the INDIO_DIRECT_MODE raw writes. I
don't spot any buffer usage. Furthermore, as far as I can say the 'sign'
and 'storagebits' are unused.
My understanding has been that the scan_type is only intended for
parsing the buffered values, and usually when the data direction is from
driver to user.
I suppose I shouldn't copy the ad5624r_spi.c use of scan_type to a new
driver. I'm somewhat tempted to send a patch which drops the scan_type
from the ad5624r_spi.c, and adds the 'realbits' and 'shift' to the
driver's internal struct ad5624r_state. This, however, will change the
interface to userland so maybe it's best to not do that.
I wonder if I am missing something? (That wouldn't be unheard of XD). If
not, then at least a documentary patch with a comment "don't do this in
new drivers" might be Ok, or how do you see this?
Yours,
-- Matti
next reply other threads:[~2024-12-18 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-18 8:38 Matti Vaittinen [this message]
2024-12-18 20:53 ` iio: dac: ad5624r_spi.c - use of scan_type David Lechner
2024-12-19 6:05 ` Matti Vaittinen
2024-12-19 12:20 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3f5ff01b-8c32-423f-b3cc-a95399b69399@gmail.com \
--to=mazziesaccount@gmail.com \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox