Re: [PATCH RFC] staging:iio: adis16209 accelerometer driver initial import

[Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>]

On 05/06/10 11:23, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 05/06/10 10:33, Barry Song wrote:
>> Thanks a lot for your review and good comments. I have updated
>> adis16209 and adis16240(which has been tested too) according to your
>> comment. I am 100% sure we will pull new iio features to our tree. But
>> i am busy on testing adis16220/260/350, so if possible, i still need
>> your help to merge them into 2.6.35 just like adis16300/400 for the
>> moment.
> You are welcome.  Post the updated patches here as and when they are ready.
> It would be great to get a nasty 
 Freudian slip of the day.  That was meant to say 'nice' :)
>large driver set merged for 2.6.35 as
> iio could do with exposure and publicity that will generate!
> 
> All the reponses look good to me, so looking forward to seeing the
> updated driver.  I'll have a think about the best fix in the core for the
> current need to register an empty event attribute group.  It is kind of
> a driver bug, but then the stage you are at is pretty typical for a driver
> still under development so it would be nice if it didn't cause a problem!
> 
> As long as the patches are new drivers or fixs, I'd imaging Greg will be keep taking them
> until at least the beginning of the merge window (probably a couple of
> weeks time).  As staging usually merges pretty late, we may well sneak
> in a few more when the window is open, but that's entirely up to Greg.
>