* IIO: ownership of patches taking drivers out of staging.
@ 2011-09-27 13:32 Jonathan Cameron
2011-09-27 13:34 ` Manuel Stahl
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2011-09-27 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Hennerich, Michael, Amit Kucheria,
Manuel Stahl
Hi All,
I'm putting together a patch set to propose the first step in moving
IIO out of the staging tree.
I want to take a small set (initially) of representative drivers
along for the ride.
Now unlike later elements which will consist of git moves (and hence
preserve history) those that come with us now will be done by
stripping down the drivers and then building their feature set
back up as we go.
My question here is whether people are happy if I assign authorship
of patches for their drivers to them (with appropriate note and
sign off from me to explain where they came from).
Right now my example set consists of
ad799x - Michael's
max1363 - mine :)
tsl2583 - Amit's
adis16400 - Manuel's but with large bits from drivers of mine
and Barry Song. I'm fine with it being Manuel's.
Copyright notice covers that some of it is Analog's
so, Michael, is that fine with you guys?
So I need responses from Amit, Michael and Manuel as to whether
they mind me setting author of relevant drivers to them? I'd
obviously also like sign offs once you have had time to look
at them. I'll post an updated tree shortly to github.
Thanks,
Jonathan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: IIO: ownership of patches taking drivers out of staging.
2011-09-27 13:32 IIO: ownership of patches taking drivers out of staging Jonathan Cameron
@ 2011-09-27 13:34 ` Manuel Stahl
2011-09-27 13:57 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-09-27 14:59 ` Amit Kucheria
2011-09-28 6:58 ` Hennerich, Michael
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Manuel Stahl @ 2011-09-27 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Cameron
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Hennerich, Michael, Amit Kucheria
Hi Jonathon,
I'm fine with that. Of course we could also change ownership for adis16400 to
Michael, as I don't have the time to actively support this one.
I have a few others in the pipeline (lis331dlh, itg3200) that I will publish
as soon as we have a stable API in mainline.
Regards,
Manuel
Am Dienstag, 27. September 2011, 15:32:33 schrieb Jonathan Cameron:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm putting together a patch set to propose the first step in moving
> IIO out of the staging tree.
>
> I want to take a small set (initially) of representative drivers
> along for the ride.
>
> Now unlike later elements which will consist of git moves (and hence
> preserve history) those that come with us now will be done by
> stripping down the drivers and then building their feature set
> back up as we go.
>
> My question here is whether people are happy if I assign authorship
> of patches for their drivers to them (with appropriate note and
> sign off from me to explain where they came from).
>
> Right now my example set consists of
>
> ad799x - Michael's
> max1363 - mine :)
> tsl2583 - Amit's
> adis16400 - Manuel's but with large bits from drivers of mine
> and Barry Song. I'm fine with it being Manuel's.
> Copyright notice covers that some of it is Analog's
> so, Michael, is that fine with you guys?
>
> So I need responses from Amit, Michael and Manuel as to whether
> they mind me setting author of relevant drivers to them? I'd
> obviously also like sign offs once you have had time to look
> at them. I'll post an updated tree shortly to github.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: IIO: ownership of patches taking drivers out of staging.
2011-09-27 13:34 ` Manuel Stahl
@ 2011-09-27 13:57 ` Jonathan Cameron
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2011-09-27 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Manuel Stahl; +Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Hennerich, Michael, Amit Kucheria
On 09/27/11 14:34, Manuel Stahl wrote:
> Hi Jonathon,
>
> I'm fine with that. Of course we could also change ownership for adis16400 to
> Michael, as I don't have the time to actively support this one.
> I have a few others in the pipeline (lis331dlh, itg3200) that I will publish
> as soon as we have a stable API in mainline.
Cool. Unless Michael particularly wants it, why don't we put a maintainers
entry in that lists the Analog list along side linux-iio as contact points.
either Michael or I can then take the maintainer role as emails will get to
both of us (and you for that matter) anyway.
Jonathan
>
> Regards,
> Manuel
>
> Am Dienstag, 27. September 2011, 15:32:33 schrieb Jonathan Cameron:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I'm putting together a patch set to propose the first step in moving
>> IIO out of the staging tree.
>>
>> I want to take a small set (initially) of representative drivers
>> along for the ride.
>>
>> Now unlike later elements which will consist of git moves (and hence
>> preserve history) those that come with us now will be done by
>> stripping down the drivers and then building their feature set
>> back up as we go.
>>
>> My question here is whether people are happy if I assign authorship
>> of patches for their drivers to them (with appropriate note and
>> sign off from me to explain where they came from).
>>
>> Right now my example set consists of
>>
>> ad799x - Michael's
>> max1363 - mine :)
>> tsl2583 - Amit's
>> adis16400 - Manuel's but with large bits from drivers of mine
>> and Barry Song. I'm fine with it being Manuel's.
>> Copyright notice covers that some of it is Analog's
>> so, Michael, is that fine with you guys?
>>
>> So I need responses from Amit, Michael and Manuel as to whether
>> they mind me setting author of relevant drivers to them? I'd
>> obviously also like sign offs once you have had time to look
>> at them. I'll post an updated tree shortly to github.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: IIO: ownership of patches taking drivers out of staging.
2011-09-27 13:32 IIO: ownership of patches taking drivers out of staging Jonathan Cameron
2011-09-27 13:34 ` Manuel Stahl
@ 2011-09-27 14:59 ` Amit Kucheria
2011-09-27 15:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-09-28 6:58 ` Hennerich, Michael
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Amit Kucheria @ 2011-09-27 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Cameron
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Hennerich, Michael, Manuel Stahl
On 11 Sep 27, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm putting together a patch set to propose the first step in moving
> IIO out of the staging tree.
>
> I want to take a small set (initially) of representative drivers
> along for the ride.
>
> Now unlike later elements which will consist of git moves (and hence
> preserve history) those that come with us now will be done by
> stripping down the drivers and then building their feature set
> back up as we go.
>
> My question here is whether people are happy if I assign authorship
> of patches for their drivers to them (with appropriate note and
> sign off from me to explain where they came from).
>
> Right now my example set consists of
>
> ad799x - Michael's
> max1363 - mine :)
> tsl2583 - Amit's
> adis16400 - Manuel's but with large bits from drivers of mine
> and Barry Song. I'm fine with it being Manuel's.
> Copyright notice covers that some of it is Analog's
> so, Michael, is that fine with you guys?
>
> So I need responses from Amit, Michael and Manuel as to whether
> they mind me setting author of relevant drivers to them? I'd
> obviously also like sign offs once you have had time to look
> at them. I'll post an updated tree shortly to github.
>
Yes, that'd be fine. I'll try to test out the changes/moves as we go but I
won't be close to HW and a reliable internet connection over the next few
weeks.
/Amit
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: IIO: ownership of patches taking drivers out of staging.
2011-09-27 14:59 ` Amit Kucheria
@ 2011-09-27 15:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2011-09-27 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Amit Kucheria; +Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Hennerich, Michael, Manuel Stahl
On 09/27/11 15:59, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On 11 Sep 27, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I'm putting together a patch set to propose the first step in moving
>> IIO out of the staging tree.
>>
>> I want to take a small set (initially) of representative drivers
>> along for the ride.
>>
>> Now unlike later elements which will consist of git moves (and hence
>> preserve history) those that come with us now will be done by
>> stripping down the drivers and then building their feature set
>> back up as we go.
>>
>> My question here is whether people are happy if I assign authorship
>> of patches for their drivers to them (with appropriate note and
>> sign off from me to explain where they came from).
>>
>> Right now my example set consists of
>>
>> ad799x - Michael's
>> max1363 - mine :)
>> tsl2583 - Amit's
>> adis16400 - Manuel's but with large bits from drivers of mine
>> and Barry Song. I'm fine with it being Manuel's.
>> Copyright notice covers that some of it is Analog's
>> so, Michael, is that fine with you guys?
>>
>> So I need responses from Amit, Michael and Manuel as to whether
>> they mind me setting author of relevant drivers to them? I'd
>> obviously also like sign offs once you have had time to look
>> at them. I'll post an updated tree shortly to github.
>>
>
> Yes, that'd be fine. I'll try to test out the changes/moves as we go but I
> won't be close to HW and a reliable internet connection over the next few
> weeks.
>
> /Amit
>
Not to worry. It's a rare thing but I actually have a part to test that
particular driver (have a tsl2561)
Thanks,
Jonathan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: ownership of patches taking drivers out of staging.
2011-09-27 13:32 IIO: ownership of patches taking drivers out of staging Jonathan Cameron
2011-09-27 13:34 ` Manuel Stahl
2011-09-27 14:59 ` Amit Kucheria
@ 2011-09-28 6:58 ` Hennerich, Michael
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Hennerich, Michael @ 2011-09-28 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Cameron
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Amit Kucheria, Manuel Stahl,
Device-drivers-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org
Jonathan Cameron wrote on 2011-09-27:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm putting together a patch set to propose the first step in moving
> IIO out of the staging tree.
>
> I want to take a small set (initially) of representative drivers
> along for the ride.
>
> Now unlike later elements which will consist of git moves (and hence
> preserve history) those that come with us now will be done by
> stripping down the drivers and then building their feature set
> back up as we go.
>
> My question here is whether people are happy if I assign authorship
> of patches for their drivers to them (with appropriate note and
> sign off from me to explain where they came from).
>
> Right now my example set consists of
>
> ad799x - Michael's
> max1363 - mine :)
> tsl2583 - Amit's
> adis16400 - Manuel's but with large bits from drivers of mine
> and Barry Song. I'm fine with it being Manuel's.
> Copyright notice covers that some of it is Analog's
> so, Michael, is that fine with you guys?
>
> So I need responses from Amit, Michael and Manuel as to whether
> they mind me setting author of relevant drivers to them?
Hi Jonathan,
Sure - no problem.
> I'd
> obviously also like sign offs once you have had time to look
> at them. I'll post an updated tree shortly to github.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>
>
Greetings,
Michael
--
Analog Devices GmbH Wilhelm-Wagenfeld-Str. 6 80807 Muenchen
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Muenchen; Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 40368;
Geschaeftsfuehrer:Dr.Carsten Suckrow, Thomas Wessel, William A. Martin, Mar=
garet Seif
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-09-28 6:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-09-27 13:32 IIO: ownership of patches taking drivers out of staging Jonathan Cameron
2011-09-27 13:34 ` Manuel Stahl
2011-09-27 13:57 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-09-27 14:59 ` Amit Kucheria
2011-09-27 15:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-09-28 6:58 ` Hennerich, Michael
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).