From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ppsw-52.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.152]:50293 "EHLO ppsw-52.csi.cam.ac.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750932Ab1I0PEA (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:04:00 -0400 Message-ID: <4E81E7D6.60904@cam.ac.uk> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:12:22 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Amit Kucheria CC: "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" , "Hennerich, Michael" , Manuel Stahl Subject: Re: IIO: ownership of patches taking drivers out of staging. References: <4E81D071.5050806@cam.ac.uk> <20110927145907.GA2580@matterhorn1> In-Reply-To: <20110927145907.GA2580@matterhorn1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On 09/27/11 15:59, Amit Kucheria wrote: > On 11 Sep 27, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I'm putting together a patch set to propose the first step in moving >> IIO out of the staging tree. >> >> I want to take a small set (initially) of representative drivers >> along for the ride. >> >> Now unlike later elements which will consist of git moves (and hence >> preserve history) those that come with us now will be done by >> stripping down the drivers and then building their feature set >> back up as we go. >> >> My question here is whether people are happy if I assign authorship >> of patches for their drivers to them (with appropriate note and >> sign off from me to explain where they came from). >> >> Right now my example set consists of >> >> ad799x - Michael's >> max1363 - mine :) >> tsl2583 - Amit's >> adis16400 - Manuel's but with large bits from drivers of mine >> and Barry Song. I'm fine with it being Manuel's. >> Copyright notice covers that some of it is Analog's >> so, Michael, is that fine with you guys? >> >> So I need responses from Amit, Michael and Manuel as to whether >> they mind me setting author of relevant drivers to them? I'd >> obviously also like sign offs once you have had time to look >> at them. I'll post an updated tree shortly to github. >> > > Yes, that'd be fine. I'll try to test out the changes/moves as we go but I > won't be close to HW and a reliable internet connection over the next few > weeks. > > /Amit > Not to worry. It's a rare thing but I actually have a part to test that particular driver (have a tsl2561) Thanks, Jonathan