From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Michael.Hennerich@analog.com,
device-drivers-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging:iio: header reorganization
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:59:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EA15092.1090408@cam.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EA14C87.2020606@metafoo.de>
On 10/21/11 11:42, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 10/21/2011 11:09 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> Issue brought up by Lars-Peter Clausen. This is a varient of what
>> he suggested.
>>
>> io/iio.h for driver stuff (has to include types.h)
>> Sub files for the bits drivers may or may not use
>> iio/sysfs.h
>> iio/buffer.h (contents of current buffer_generic.h)
>> (obviously anything offering events will need events.h as well)
>> iio/types.h for the enums that matter to both
>> iio_chan_type, iio_modifier
>> iio/events.h for the event code stuff
>> IIO_EVENT_CODE and friends. + everything in chrdev.h So this
>> is the stuff that userspace cares about.
>> Also include iio_event_type, iio_event_direction
>>
>> Thus iio drivers include iio.h + as required
>> events.h
>> sysfs.h
>> buffer.h
>>
>> in kernel users (once that interface is merged) will need inkern.h
>> which will pull in types.h
>>
>> Userspace will need just events.h (which pulls in types.h) to get
>> everything they need to know about. Buffer userspace access doesn't
>> currently need any core defines. All information about the data
>> format is passed through sysfs.
>
> This seems to work nicely, thanks. There two minor issues left, but those
> were also present before the restructuring, I'll send patches shortly.
>
> Another issue is that you can only open the iio character device if your
> device has buffer support, so without buffer support no event support
> either. Michael said that has been some discussion on this before, do you
> remember the conclusions of that discussion?
Drat. That isn't supposed to be the case.
I guess my test parts almost all have buffers so I hadn't noticed this.
We had a nasty reverse of this issue a while back which could cause
segfaults so I slapped the protection in very quickly without thinking
enough about it.
Check in iio_chrdev_buffer_open is clearly the problem. In case with no
buffer should return 0 not -EINVAL. That way the open will have done
nothing.
Reads then return -ENODEV if there isn't a buffer or read isn't supplied
if buffer support isn't there in the core.
It'll take me a few mins to test this. Given the tsl2563 just made my
kernel dump in a random location. My favourite type of bug...
>
>> [...]
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/events.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
>> +/* The industrial I/O - event passing to userspace
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (c) 2008-2011 Jonathan Cameron
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
>> + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as published by
>> + * the Free Software Foundation.
>> + */
>> +#include "types.h"
>
> Any specific reason why you put this include above the include guard?
I always got with convention of allowing headers to handle their own include guards.
Doesn't really matter though.
>
>> +
>> +#ifndef _IIO_EVENTS_H_
>> +#define _IIO_EVENTS_H_
>> +
>> [...]
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/iio.h b/drivers/staging/iio/iio.h
>> index 429589f..339b609 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/iio.h
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/iio.h
>> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
>> * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as published by
>> * the Free Software Foundation.
>> */
>> -
>> +#include "types.h"
>
> Same here
>
>> #ifndef _INDUSTRIAL_IO_H_
>> #define _INDUSTRIAL_IO_H_
>> [...]
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-21 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-21 7:21 Userspace event handling and header files Lars-Peter Clausen
2011-10-21 8:02 ` Hennerich, Michael
2011-10-21 8:58 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-10-21 9:09 ` [PATCH] staging:iio: header reorganization Jonathan Cameron
2011-10-21 9:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-10-21 9:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-10-21 10:42 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2011-10-21 10:59 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2011-10-21 11:15 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-10-21 10:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] staging:iio: Add missing ioctl.h include to events.h Lars-Peter Clausen
2011-10-21 10:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] staging:iio: Use userspace types for iio_event_data Lars-Peter Clausen
2011-10-21 11:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-10-21 11:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] staging:iio: Add missing ioctl.h include to events.h Jonathan Cameron
2011-10-21 9:42 ` Userspace event handling and header files Lars-Peter Clausen
2011-10-21 9:44 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-10-21 9:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EA15092.1090408@cam.ac.uk \
--to=jic23@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=device-drivers-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).