linux-iio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
To: Shubhrajyoti Datta <omaplinuxkernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>,
	Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	device-drivers-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org, drivers@analog.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging:iio:dac: Add AD5764 driver
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:46:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ECA2C13.6080901@metafoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM=Q2cv2kbpLxtgmJ=zSGRnmd6MyxuqRb3ErMjKmLbUitm4+bg@mail.gmail.com>

On 11/21/2011 10:04 AM, Shubhrajyoti Datta wrote:

>> +static int ad5764_chan_info_to_reg(struct iio_chan_spec const *chan, long info)
>> +{
>> +       switch (info) {
>> +       case 0:
>> +               return AD5764_REG_DATA(chan->address);
>> +       case IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBBIAS:
>> +               return AD5764_REG_OFFSET(chan->address);
>> +       case IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBSCALE:
>> +               return AD5764_REG_FINE_GAIN(chan->address);
>> +       default:
>> +               BUG();
> Should we BUG here?
> Is it that severe  because it will halt the whole system?

given that this should only trigger if something went wrong really bad I
think it is OK to BUG here. As far as I can see the compiler will even
remove it, since it is in a dead code path.

- Lars

  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-21 10:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-21  8:53 [PATCH] staging:iio:dac: Add AD5764 driver Lars-Peter Clausen
2011-11-21  9:04 ` Shubhrajyoti Datta
2011-11-21 10:46   ` Lars-Peter Clausen [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-12-05 16:05 Lars-Peter Clausen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4ECA2C13.6080901@metafoo.de \
    --to=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=device-drivers-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org \
    --cc=drivers@analog.com \
    --cc=jic23@cam.ac.uk \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.hennerich@analog.com \
    --cc=omaplinuxkernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).