From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>,
Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
device-drivers-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org, drivers@analog.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging:iio: Fix scan mask update
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 09:48:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EE087E2.5040901@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1323269024-21656-1-git-send-email-lars@metafoo.de>
On 12/07/2011 02:43 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> When updating the scan mask we have to check the actual scan mask for if the
> channel is already enabled, not the matching scan mask from the available
> scan masks. The bit will already be set there and as a result the actual
> scan mask will not get updated and the channel stays disabled.
Dratt, I messed this case up didn't I! I guess my tests only make
changes that effect the scan mask. Oops.
Thanks for the catch. This is clearly a hole in my tests...
>
> Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/staging/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 12 ++----------
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/industrialio-buffer.c b/drivers/staging/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> index f629e8b..a539c7c 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ static ssize_t iio_scan_el_store(struct device *dev,
> error_ret:
> mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
>
> - return ret ? ret : len;
> + return ret < 0 ? ret : len;
>
> }
>
> @@ -617,16 +617,8 @@ int iio_scan_mask_query(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>
> if (!buffer->scan_mask)
> return 0;
> - if (indio_dev->available_scan_masks)
> - mask = iio_scan_mask_match(indio_dev->available_scan_masks,
> - indio_dev->masklength,
> - buffer->scan_mask);
> - else
> - mask = buffer->scan_mask;
> - if (!mask)
> - return 0;
>
> - return test_bit(bit, mask);
> + return test_bit(bit, buffer->scan_mask);
> };
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iio_scan_mask_query);
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-08 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-07 14:43 [PATCH] staging:iio: Fix scan mask update Lars-Peter Clausen
2011-12-08 9:48 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EE087E2.5040901@kernel.org \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=device-drivers-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org \
--cc=drivers@analog.com \
--cc=jic23@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.hennerich@analog.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).