From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>,
Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
device-drivers-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org, drivers@analog.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] staging:iio:events: Use waitqueue lock to protect event queue
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 20:57:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EEFA546.5010204@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1324290580-17511-4-git-send-email-lars@metafoo.de>
On 12/19/2011 10:29 AM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> Use the waitqueue lock to protect the event queue instead of a custom mutex.
> This has the advantage that we can call the waitqueue operations with the lock
> held, which simplifies the code flow a bit.
>
Unusual ordering of this. usually your sign off first then everyone
elses whatever below.
> Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
> ---
> drivers/staging/iio/industrialio-event.c | 45 ++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/industrialio-event.c b/drivers/staging/iio/industrialio-event.c
> index d63aa0b..b5f7a2c 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/industrialio-event.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/industrialio-event.c
> @@ -34,8 +34,7 @@
> * @group: event interface sysfs attribute group
> */
> struct iio_event_interface {
> - wait_queue_head_t wait;
> - struct mutex event_list_lock;
> + wait_queue_head_t wait;
> DECLARE_KFIFO(det_events, struct iio_event_data, 16);
>
> struct list_head dev_attr_list;
> @@ -50,19 +49,17 @@ int iio_push_event(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, u64 ev_code, s64 timestamp)
> int copied;
>
> /* Does anyone care? */
> - mutex_lock(&ev_int->event_list_lock);
> + spin_lock(&ev_int->wait.lock);
> if (test_bit(IIO_BUSY_BIT_POS, &ev_int->flags)) {
>
> ev.id = ev_code;
> ev.timestamp = timestamp;
>
> copied = kfifo_put(&ev_int->det_events, &ev);
> -
> - mutex_unlock(&ev_int->event_list_lock);
> if (copied != 0)
> - wake_up_interruptible(&ev_int->wait);
> - } else
> - mutex_unlock(&ev_int->event_list_lock);
> + wake_up_locked(&ev_int->wait);
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&ev_int->wait.lock);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -80,28 +77,25 @@ static ssize_t iio_event_chrdev_read(struct file *filep,
> if (count < sizeof(struct iio_event_data))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - mutex_lock(&ev_int->event_list_lock);
> + spin_lock(&ev_int->wait.lock);
> if (kfifo_is_empty(&ev_int->det_events)) {
> if (filep->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) {
> ret = -EAGAIN;
> - goto error_mutex_unlock;
> + goto error_unlock;
> }
> - mutex_unlock(&ev_int->event_list_lock);
> /* Blocking on device; waiting for something to be there */
> - ret = wait_event_interruptible(ev_int->wait,
> + ret = wait_event_interruptible_locked(ev_int->wait,
> !kfifo_is_empty(&ev_int->det_events));
> if (ret)
> - goto error_ret;
> + goto error_unlock;
> /* Single access device so no one else can get the data */
> - mutex_lock(&ev_int->event_list_lock);
> }
>
> - mutex_unlock(&ev_int->event_list_lock);
> ret = kfifo_to_user(&ev_int->det_events, buf, count, &copied);
>
> -error_mutex_unlock:
> - mutex_unlock(&ev_int->event_list_lock);
> -error_ret:
> +error_unlock:
> + spin_unlock(&ev_int->wait.lock);
> +
> return ret ? ret : copied;
> }
>
> @@ -109,7 +103,7 @@ static int iio_event_chrdev_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
> {
> struct iio_event_interface *ev_int = filep->private_data;
>
> - mutex_lock(&ev_int->event_list_lock);
> + spin_lock(&ev_int->wait.lock);
> clear_bit(IIO_BUSY_BIT_POS, &ev_int->flags);
> /*
> * In order to maintain a clean state for reopening,
> @@ -117,7 +111,7 @@ static int iio_event_chrdev_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
> * any new __iio_push_event calls running.
> */
> kfifo_reset_out(&ev_int->det_events);
> - mutex_unlock(&ev_int->event_list_lock);
> + spin_unlock(&ev_int->wait.lock);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -137,18 +131,18 @@ int iio_event_getfd(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> if (ev_int == NULL)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> - mutex_lock(&ev_int->event_list_lock);
> + spin_lock(&ev_int->wait.lock);
> if (test_and_set_bit(IIO_BUSY_BIT_POS, &ev_int->flags)) {
> - mutex_unlock(&ev_int->event_list_lock);
> + spin_unlock(&ev_int->wait.lock);
> return -EBUSY;
> }
> - mutex_unlock(&ev_int->event_list_lock);
> + spin_unlock(&ev_int->wait.lock);
> fd = anon_inode_getfd("iio:event",
> &iio_event_chrdev_fileops, ev_int, O_RDONLY);
> if (fd < 0) {
> - mutex_lock(&ev_int->event_list_lock);
> + spin_lock(&ev_int->wait.lock);
> clear_bit(IIO_BUSY_BIT_POS, &ev_int->flags);
> - mutex_unlock(&ev_int->event_list_lock);
> + spin_unlock(&ev_int->wait.lock);
> }
> return fd;
> }
> @@ -357,7 +351,6 @@ static bool iio_check_for_dynamic_events(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>
> static void iio_setup_ev_int(struct iio_event_interface *ev_int)
> {
> - mutex_init(&ev_int->event_list_lock);
> INIT_KFIFO(ev_int->det_events);
> init_waitqueue_head(&ev_int->wait);
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-19 20:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-19 10:29 [PATCH v2 1/6] staging:iio: Update iio_event_interface documentation Lars-Peter Clausen
2011-12-19 10:29 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] staging:iio:events: Use non-atmoic bitops Lars-Peter Clausen
2011-12-19 20:59 ` Jonathan Cameron
2012-01-29 10:49 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-12-19 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] staging:iio: Update iio_event_interface documentation Jonathan Cameron
2011-12-19 21:28 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
[not found] ` <1324290580-17511-2-git-send-email-lars@metafoo.de>
2011-12-19 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] staging:iio: Factor out event handling into its own file Jonathan Cameron
[not found] ` <1324290580-17511-3-git-send-email-lars@metafoo.de>
2011-12-19 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] staging:iio:events: Use kfifo for event queue Jonathan Cameron
[not found] ` <1324290580-17511-4-git-send-email-lars@metafoo.de>
2011-12-19 20:57 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2011-12-19 21:28 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] staging:iio:events: Use waitqueue lock to protect " Lars-Peter Clausen
2012-01-29 18:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2012-01-31 17:26 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2012-01-31 20:58 ` Jonathan Cameron
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-02-01 18:45 [PATCH v2 0/6] staging:iio: Event handling updates Lars-Peter Clausen
2012-02-01 18:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] staging:iio:events: Use waitqueue lock to protect event queue Lars-Peter Clausen
2012-02-01 21:17 [PATCH v2 0/6] staging:iio: Event handling updates Lars-Peter Clausen
2012-02-01 21:17 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] staging:iio:events: Use waitqueue lock to protect event queue Lars-Peter Clausen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EEFA546.5010204@kernel.org \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=device-drivers-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org \
--cc=drivers@analog.com \
--cc=jic23@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.hennerich@analog.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).