From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, greg@kroah.com,
guenter.roeck@ericsson.com, khali@linux-fr.org,
dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
arnd@arndb.de, maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com,
thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com, zdevai@gmail.com,
w.sang@pengutronix.de, marek.vasut@gmail.com,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] staging:iio:core add in kernel interface mapping and getting IIO channels.
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:30:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F30466C.8070101@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdYRTHH4wLw7RWJEY5zpG7rt9mQKs7rXmjuuA9Ww07JT-w@mail.gmail.com>
On 02/01/2012 07:58 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:
>> On 01/30/2012 08:22 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:46:50AM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>>
>>>> + mutex_lock(&iio_map_list_lock); + while ((maps[i].consumer_dev
>>>> != NULL) || + (maps[i].consumer_dev_name != NULL)) {
>>>
>>> I'd suggest just dropping the struct device - the reason we support
>>> the struct device directly in the regulator API is that we
>>> originally had only a struct device and kept the code around as a
>>> transition measure (though now it's so old we should be able to
>>> kill it off). This would simplify the code and the interface a
>>> bit.
>>
>> Ah, that explains your comment on the 5th patch. Alright, I'll let this
>> sit for a few days and if no one comes up with a good reason not to
>> we'll go with just the dev_name option.
>
> I've just deleted the yse of struct device * from the pin control
> subsystem and I bet ark will have it deleted from regulator_consumer
> before long, so just let it go :-)
>
struct device * use removed from IIO, but I won't be posting just yet
as something has borked my i2c that'll need tracking down before I can
test an updated version.
For reference in the meantime, the other change is that the
iio_device_unregister sets the info pointer to NULL, thus providing
a convenient way of knowing the parent device has gone away without
i think allowing for any raceconditions (this will happen before the
bus unregister which was what was causing me trouble).
Jonathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-06 21:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-29 11:46 [RFC PATCH 0/5 V5] IIO: in kernel pull interfaces Jonathan Cameron
2012-01-29 11:46 ` [PATCH 1/5] staging:iio:core add in kernel interface mapping and getting IIO channels Jonathan Cameron
2012-01-30 20:22 ` Mark Brown
2012-01-30 20:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2012-02-01 19:58 ` Linus Walleij
2012-02-06 21:30 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2012-02-09 18:10 ` Greg KH
2012-02-09 18:34 ` Jonathan Cameron
2012-02-09 18:57 ` Greg KH
2012-02-09 19:15 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-09 19:17 ` Greg KH
2012-02-09 19:20 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-09 21:20 ` Jonathan Cameron
2012-02-10 1:03 ` Linus Walleij
2012-01-29 11:46 ` [PATCH 2/5] staging:iio: move iio data return types into types.h for use by inkern Jonathan Cameron
2012-01-29 11:46 ` [PATCH 3/5] staging:iio::hwmon interface client driver Jonathan Cameron
2012-01-29 11:46 ` [PATCH 4/5] staging:iio:Documentation in kernel pull description Jonathan Cameron
2012-01-29 11:46 ` [PATCH 5/5] stargate2: example of map configuration for iio to hwmon example Jonathan Cameron
2012-01-30 19:33 ` Mark Brown
2012-01-30 20:26 ` Jonathan Cameron
2012-01-30 21:22 ` Mark Brown
2012-01-30 21:48 ` Jonathan Cameron
2012-01-31 8:39 ` Linus Walleij
2012-01-31 11:09 ` Mark Brown
2012-01-30 19:28 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5 V5] IIO: in kernel pull interfaces Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F30466C.8070101@kernel.org \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=guenter.roeck@ericsson.com \
--cc=jic23@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
--cc=zdevai@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).