From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
"Hennerich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>
Subject: IIO include folder hierarchy
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 10:39:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FB21652.9070809@metafoo.de> (raw)
Hi,
I was just preparing a patch to move the DAC drivers out of staging. And I'm
wondering if we want to use a flat hierarchy in the IIO include folder, i.e
put all includes in toplevel folder. Or if we want individual subfolders for
the different device classes (e.g. include/linux/iio/dac/ in this case). I'd
opt for the later since I fear that things would get quite messy over time
in the toplevel folder.
Thanks,
- Lars
next reply other threads:[~2012-05-15 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-15 8:39 Lars-Peter Clausen [this message]
2012-05-15 8:40 ` IIO include folder hierarchy Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FB21652.9070809@metafoo.de \
--to=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).