Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] iio: adc: ad7173: remove special handling for irq number

[David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>]

On 11/28/24 12:47 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 10:02 PM David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> wrote:
>>
>> Remove the int irq_line field in struct ad_sigma_delta_info and all code
>> that referenced it.
>>
>> This struct is intended to be used as static const data. Currently, the
>> only user that doesn't uses the static const struct directly, namely the
>> ad7173 driver is making a copy of this struct to be able to modify the
>> irq_line field. However, this field is written and never used due to the
>> fact that ad_sd_init() which reads the field is called before
>> ad7173_fw_parse_device_config() which writes it.
>>
>> The runtime behavior does not change since ad_sd_init() was already
>> (unintentionally) being called with irq_line = 0.  But, even though
>> this could be considered a bug, the behavior was still correct. The SPI
>> subsystem always uses the first interrupt in the interrupts array from
>> the devicetree and the devicetree bindings for this family of chips
>> specify that the RDY interrupt is always the first interrupt. Therefore,
>> we don't actually need the special call to fwnode_irq_get_byname(), so
>> it is removed in this patch instead of moving it to the correct place.
> 
> ...
> 
>>  struct ad7173_state {
>>         struct ad_sigma_delta sd;
>> -       struct ad_sigma_delta_info sigma_delta_info;
>> +       struct ad_sigma_delta_chip_info sigma_delta_info;
>>         const struct ad7173_device_info *info;
>>         struct ad7173_channel *channels;
>>         struct regulator_bulk_data regulators[3];
> 
> Has this patch been compile-tested? Because I don't understand this
> change and how it's going to be compiled.
> 

I did compile test each commit, but it looks like I might have
squashed a fix into the wrong patch. :-(