public inbox for linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cengiz Can <cengiz@kernel.wtf>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: "Alexandru Ardelean" <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>,
	"Ekin Böke" <ekin_boke@arcelik.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Control Register device tree binding request for Opt3001
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 15:38:15 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4e0b8e47a2644d304b2d1e6b2e087136@kernel.wtf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210218121502.00002014@Huawei.com>

Hello Jonathan, Alexandru and Ekin

On 2021-02-18 15:15, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> 
> As described, what you want to control here is policy, not a 
> characteristic
> of the hardware.   Normally we don't use DT to make such decisions, as 
> it should
> be controlled at runtime.

I'm by no means an expert on sensors and I don't fully understand the 
distinction
of policy vs characteristic in this context.

Can you clarify a bit?

For example, many TFT drivers allow maximum-minimum brightness values in 
devicetree
and even set a default brightness value. Totally within the specs of 
vendor of course.

Since this is just a hardware register that can be changed, and possibly 
never to be
modified (depending on the use case of course) during runtime, I would 
like to be able
to set it once during initialization and forget about it.

Currently I have a oneshot systemd unit that echo's my desired 
integration value and
I think that's a bit late for my application. (even with all the 
priority and orderings set).

> 
> So basically what Alex said :)
> 
> Jonathan
> 

Thank you

-- 
Cengiz Can
@cengiz_io

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-18 15:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-18  5:18 Control Register device tree binding request for Opt3001 Ekin Böke
2021-02-18  8:31 ` Matt Ranostay
2021-02-18  8:35 ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-18 12:15   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-18 12:38     ` Cengiz Can [this message]
2021-02-21 12:26       ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4e0b8e47a2644d304b2d1e6b2e087136@kernel.wtf \
    --to=cengiz@kernel.wtf \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=ardeleanalex@gmail.com \
    --cc=ekin_boke@arcelik.com \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox