From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: iio: Adjust checks for null pointers in six functions
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net>
 <c11fbb47-1fd3-4e9e-042e-0f271cfef814@users.sourceforge.net>
 <8e0c9fdd-fc9a-0093-278f-00f3beb2a8f6@users.sourceforge.net>
 <5064024e-3510-cec9-d925-b617f7204579@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
 Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
 Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
 LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
 Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <4e79ad49-17fc-1ab9-6a88-06cff959b6de@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 16:44:08 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5064024e-3510-cec9-d925-b617f7204579@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
List-ID: <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>

> This is a more worthwhile change in my mind to the jump label changes.

Thanks for another bit of positive feedback for this refactoring.


> Would you mind resending with it not based on top of those?

Is a resend really needed?

Does the tool "Git" let you also apply this update step before
the other suggestions?

Would you dare a reordering of items according to your change preferences?

Regards,
Markus