From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.manjaro.org (mail.manjaro.org [116.203.91.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D389C146001; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 14:55:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=116.203.91.91 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709045740; cv=none; b=MvHFbiTI/HMYPLLrZQsOTdeUOPs7pT3VsVpYdJVpw9h4XN80jMtR47xUVX0xOrTduwbtJIM9wGe0rvF21AGpoYbH5/Ajchz4TKXND+14ZPSQN5IuFlQMQF1UaPZ8ZtmI/KhyIwPbl2a0pjF4rot25FgaKqaXByJce9bQdYX2BUw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709045740; c=relaxed/simple; bh=c6nAddq+joHIj3aBJ5XpAdzF2ktzWSmOTZPUik72jyg=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Message-ID:Content-Type; b=bo+uCJK3Vu8yBoZ2BldGKB7Pe/IjQlQ/l0eXovKoviWviPcWvDpkoxlZEXvgSVn2un7BAN4Abeu3XnY4R1SXephwpTrdvWFfQHx2zX1V2CoJTisi451Os2hSBRI6WWDPBv+Aw8MZKGKEiiSvumdrjSDmdHdtykYLRbHWSWXVEHY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=manjaro.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=manjaro.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=manjaro.org header.i=@manjaro.org header.b=ociEBA5K; arc=none smtp.client-ip=116.203.91.91 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=manjaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=manjaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=manjaro.org header.i=@manjaro.org header.b="ociEBA5K" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=manjaro.org; s=2021; t=1709045729; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=m+buA9KQcshQo11eLqij6u65fXQy9H9bVSZZKj/86ws=; b=ociEBA5Krod3ExR4KO+TwRlaQsQhio31/u7nVUn5SOGGQyPOonbCNwlQhh5OAbSa1XFGxJ WB7Ti9m8vg1Y1oVLvVW0Tn4lhAyjqCdU3CTH9DTZ02ATz8TWV5526kfE9EklDdzqv4fqoz S324zYaRdlnWk566Mg1rgII2+VpTrbLsGQrleCoivuW6Vtm9FO0T5NeOPM1u0IBbNZgFec g6GumCX2voAPVqqeqcMqH4bEn23soZUH/jpNiY97WXzSY8drPkS7YmNt9yq4ha5pXSCJVt l4YhisH4rgH+E7MX4uMTmYauBNuKFnTj/iYOR91SUz/I+vcU5tzEd2JxKiFgzQ== Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 15:55:27 +0100 From: Dragan Simic To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Quentin Schulz , Quentin Schulz , Jonathan Cameron , Lars-Peter Clausen , Heiko Stuebner , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Shreeya Patel , Simon Xue , Philipp Zabel , Jonathan Cameron , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] iio: adc: rockchip_saradc: replace custom logic with devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive In-Reply-To: References: <20240223-saradcv2-chan-mask-v1-0-84b06a0f623a@theobroma-systems.com> <20240223-saradcv2-chan-mask-v1-3-84b06a0f623a@theobroma-systems.com> <6f76ffab-69fe-4afb-9d7e-d3cdfe37c28c@theobroma-systems.com> Message-ID: <509bf12609dce4fb4bdccb657dd75a95@manjaro.org> X-Sender: dsimic@manjaro.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Authentication-Results: ORIGINATING; auth=pass smtp.auth=dsimic@manjaro.org smtp.mailfrom=dsimic@manjaro.org On 2024-02-27 13:48, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 10:31 PM Dragan Simic > wrote: >> On 2024-02-23 15:39, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 3:10 PM Quentin Schulz >> > wrote: >> >> On 2/23/24 14:00, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > ... > >> >> I would still be reachable at that Cc address without having to modify >> >> the .mailmap after the fact (which won't make it to an earlier version >> >> of the kernel for example). Some maintainers don't really like this, >> >> some don't mind, we'll see in which category the IIO maintainer(s) >> >> fall >> >> in :) (I don't mind either way just to be clear). >> > >> > My point is that Cc and other similar (non-real-tags) stuff is >> > polluting commit messages. It means that this will be copied to the >> > Git index to all kernel git repositories in the world from now and >> > then, This is at bare minimum makes additional burden on git log (and >> > parsing and so on) and moreover, wastes resources becoming less >> > environment friendly (no jokes). Using --cc or moving to the behind >> > the commit message will keep email copied with cleaner commit >> > messages. Yet, all email tags are available in lore archive >> > (lore.kernel.org). Please, really reconsider the commit messages >> > content in the Linux kernel project and elsewhere, it will help to >> > make the world more friendly. >> >> Believe it or not, I'm working on some patches for Git that, I >> believe, >> should help a lot when it comes to handling Cc: addresses. Would you >> like to be included in the list of recipients for those Git patches, >> so >> you could, hopefully, provide some feeback? > > You may Cc me if you want to, but I can't guarantee I have time or > valuable input to that. Thanks, I'll be happy to have another set of eyes on those Git patches.