From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] staging:iio:imu: adis16400 switch from sw_ring to kfifo
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 15:35:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50B8C441.1040407@metafoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1354285372-11779-5-git-send-email-jic23@kernel.org>
On 11/30/2012 03:22 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> sw ring is going away so switch over to kfifo based buffer implementation.
> The only real change is that poll will return on some data there rather than
> buffer 50% full.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Is is ok for you to drop this one and wait with the last patch in the series
still a bit? I've patches to switch this driver over to the adislib and this
patch would probably introduce a couple of conflicts.
The rest of the series looks good.
Thanks,
- Lars
> ---
> drivers/staging/iio/imu/Kconfig | 2 +-
> drivers/staging/iio/imu/adis16400_ring.c | 12 ++++++------
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/imu/Kconfig b/drivers/staging/iio/imu/Kconfig
> index 2c2f47d..b9d9c14 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/imu/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/imu/Kconfig
> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ menu "Inertial measurement units"
> config ADIS16400
> tristate "Analog Devices ADIS16400 and similar IMU SPI driver"
> depends on SPI
> - select IIO_SW_RING if IIO_BUFFER
> + select IIO_KFIFO_BUF if IIO_BUFFER
> select IIO_TRIGGER if IIO_BUFFER
> help
> Say yes here to build support for Analog Devices adis16300, adis16344,
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/imu/adis16400_ring.c b/drivers/staging/iio/imu/adis16400_ring.c
> index d46c1e3..319c2c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/imu/adis16400_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/imu/adis16400_ring.c
> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
> #include <linux/export.h>
>
> #include <linux/iio/iio.h>
> -#include "../ring_sw.h"
> +#include <linux/iio/kfifo_buf.h>
> #include <linux/iio/trigger_consumer.h>
> #include "adis16400.h"
>
> @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ done:
> void adis16400_unconfigure_ring(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> {
> iio_dealloc_pollfunc(indio_dev->pollfunc);
> - iio_sw_rb_free(indio_dev->buffer);
> + iio_kfifo_free(indio_dev->buffer);
> }
>
> static const struct iio_buffer_setup_ops adis16400_ring_setup_ops = {
> @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ int adis16400_configure_ring(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> int ret = 0;
> struct iio_buffer *ring;
>
> - ring = iio_sw_rb_allocate(indio_dev);
> + ring = iio_kfifo_allocate(indio_dev);
> if (!ring) {
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> return ret;
> @@ -193,12 +193,12 @@ int adis16400_configure_ring(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> indio_dev->id);
> if (indio_dev->pollfunc == NULL) {
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> - goto error_iio_sw_rb_free;
> + goto error_iio_kfifo_free;
> }
>
> indio_dev->modes |= INDIO_BUFFER_TRIGGERED;
> return 0;
> -error_iio_sw_rb_free:
> - iio_sw_rb_free(indio_dev->buffer);
> +error_iio_kfifo_free:
> + iio_kfifo_free(indio_dev->buffer);
> return ret;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-30 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-30 14:22 [PATCH 0/5] staging:iio: drop sw_ring buffer implementation Jonathan Cameron
2012-11-30 14:22 ` [PATCH 1/5] staging:iio:accel:lis3l02dq remove sw_ring support Jonathan Cameron
2012-11-30 14:22 ` [PATCH 2/5] staging:iio:impedance-analyzer switch from sw_ring to kfifo Jonathan Cameron
2012-11-30 14:22 ` [PATCH 3/5] staging:iio:meter:ade7758 " Jonathan Cameron
2012-11-30 14:22 ` [PATCH 4/5] staging:iio:imu: adis16400 " Jonathan Cameron
2012-11-30 14:35 ` Lars-Peter Clausen [this message]
2012-11-30 14:58 ` Jonathan Cameron
2012-11-30 14:22 ` [PATCH 5/5] staging:iio: drop sw_ring buffer implementation Jonathan Cameron
2013-01-19 13:49 ` [PATCH 0/5] " Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50B8C441.1040407@metafoo.de \
--to=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).