From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:60739 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751766Ab3ETJsJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 May 2013 05:48:09 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UeMhI-0005QF-Gv for linux-iio@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 20 May 2013 11:48:04 +0200 Received: from 217-67-201-162.itsa.net.pl ([217.67.201.162]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 20 May 2013 11:48:04 +0200 Received: from j.anaszewski by 217-67-201-162.itsa.net.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 20 May 2013 11:48:04 +0200 To: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org From: Jacek Anaszewski Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] iio:pressure: Add STMicroelectronics pressures driver Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 11:47:54 +0200 Message-ID: <5199F14A.5040309@samsung.com> References: <1368607493-4843-1-git-send-email-denis.ciocca@st.com> <1368607493-4843-4-git-send-email-denis.ciocca@st.com> <5197ED56.7000405@kernel.org> <4675748.2RFENMIBLW@ctocwl0124> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: Jonathan Cameron , "linux-iio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "lars-Qo5EllUWu/uELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org" , "j.anaszewski-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org" In-Reply-To: <4675748.2RFENMIBLW@ctocwl0124> Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On 05/20/2013 09:51 AM, Denis CIOCCA wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > >> Now going forward I'd of course like to see everyone happy with the >> resulting driver. Denis do you have plans to implement the threshold >> events that were in the other driver proposal? > Now I'm very full but in the future I have plans to support the threshold > events, I'm very happy if Jacek will help me! ;) Hi Jonathan, Denis, The threshold events weren't supported in my driver proposal - the events were related only to the 'data ready' interrupts. I've been playing with threshold interrupts during development, but I didn't find the device reliable by minimal threshold levels. I've lately devised a procedure of testing greater pressure differences and I will test it within few weeks, as currently I am working on another driver. Thanks, Jacek