Linux IIO development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hector Palacios <hector.palacios@digi.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	"linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
	"marex@denx.de" <marex@denx.de>,
	"fabio.estevam@freescale.com" <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] iio: mxs-lradc: add scaling to enable divide_by_two operation
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 10:58:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51D5392C.4020309@digi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51D4575E.2040002@free-electrons.com>

Dear Alexandre,

On 07/03/2013 06:54 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 03/07/2013 18:39, Hector Palacios wrote:
>> Dear Lars,
>>
>> On 07/03/2013 12:46 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>>> The scale attribute reports the scale of the raw value. To gain the
>>> value of
>>> the result in mV you have to multiply the raw attribute with the scale
>>> attribute. The scale attribute does not return the result of a
>>> conversion with
>>> a scale different applied.
>>
>> Thank you for the guidance, I misunderstood the whole thing.
>>
>>> I suggest you implement this in two steps. First implement the scale
>>> property
>>> for all channels. Use a LUT for each channel's fullscale value (in mV)
>>> and
>>> implement reading the scale like this.
>>>
>>> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
>>> *val = lut[chan->channel];
>>> *val2 = chan->scan_type.realbits;
>>> return IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2;
>>>
>>> The next step is to make the scale modifiable for channels which
>>> support this.
>>
>> I'm sorry, it's the first time I work with an iio driver and I'm afraid
>> I don't understand this.
>> Let's say the fullscale value for channel 0 is 1.85V by default (when
>> divide_by_two is disabled) and 3.7V (when enabled).
>>
>> The channel's realbits is currently set to 18, because (although the ADC
>> resolution is 12 bits) the device can read several samples and return an
>> accumulated value in 18 bits.
>>
>> Now, considering the default case where 1.85V is the max ref voltage and
>> considering that the driver only reads one sample during the raw_read
>> operation (12 bits), what value should a read of 'scale' return?
>>
>>      scale = Vref_mv / ((1 << 12) - 1) = 1850 /4095 = 0.45177045 ?
>>
>
> That's right. Although, I would think that all the values are on 18bits,
> so you probably want to use chan->scan_type.realbits there.

The field of the register that stores the sample is 18 bits, but each sample is only 
12 bits. The read_raw of a given channel will only read one sample and thus returns a 
value between 0 and 4095.
If I use realbits here it will divide the Vref_mv by (1 << 18) and will give me a 
wrong scale value.
Either we change the 'realbits' to 12 which is the real resolution of the ADC, or we 
leave it as 18 and use a 12 in this operation.

> Using IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2 allows you to avoid doing that computation
> in your driver (sometimes, it is actually difficult to get it right
> because you have to use 64 bits numbers).
>
> Also, it simplifies things a bit, you can then use something like:
>
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> *val = lut[chan->channel];
> *val2 = chan->scan_type.realbits - is_divide_by_two;
> return IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2;

Yes, but not all channels have a by two divisor. Some have a by 4, so I'll need to 
work out a formula per channel divisor.
When using IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2, val must be given in mV?

>> That is, the value to multiply the raw value to get the voltage in mV?
>> So that if reading the 'raw' returns say 425 and reading scale returns
>> 0.45177 the measured voltage is 425 * 0.45177 = 192mV?
>>
>
> Right.
>
>>
>> Then let's say I have implemented a function to modify the scale (which
>> should eventually allow me to enable/disable the by two divisor). What
>> is the user supposed to write to the 'scale'? Is he supposed to supply a
>> decimal number like 0.45177 * 2 = 0.903? This would be pretty odd.
>> Should I create a table instead so that writing a 0 means divisor
>> disabled and writing 1 means divisor enabled, for example?
>>
>
> That is why you should provide an in_voltageX_scale_available file,
> providing a list of valid values.

I see. Thank you very much.

Best regards,
--
Hector Palacios

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-07-04  8:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-03 10:06 [PATCH RFC] iio: mxs-lradc: add scaling to enable divide_by_two operation Hector Palacios
2013-07-03 10:25 ` Alexandre Belloni
2013-07-03 10:39   ` Hector Palacios
2013-07-03 10:46 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2013-07-03 16:39   ` Hector Palacios
2013-07-03 16:54     ` Alexandre Belloni
2013-07-03 17:01       ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2013-07-04  8:58       ` Hector Palacios [this message]
2013-07-04  9:10         ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2013-07-04  9:17         ` Alexandre Belloni
2013-07-04 14:50       ` Hector Palacios
2013-07-03 11:25 ` Marek Vasut

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51D5392C.4020309@digi.com \
    --to=hector.palacios@digi.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=fabio.estevam@freescale.com \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marex@denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox