linux-iio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, otavio@ossystems.com.br,
	Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] iio: mxs-lradc: Remove useless check in read_raw
Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 10:36:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51D7E504.9010506@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1372886714-25456-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de>

On 07/03/2013 10:25 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> The removed check in the read_raw implementation was always true,
> therefore remove it. This also fixes a bug, by closely inspecting
> the code, one can notice the iio_validate_scan_mask_onehot() will
> always return 1 and therefore the subsequent condition will always
> succeed, therefore making the mxs_lradc_read_raw() function always
> return -EINVAL; .
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
> Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
Applied to the fixes-togreg branch of iio.git.

Thanks,
> ---
>  drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c |    7 -------
>  1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
> 
> V2: Update the patch description, by discussion on the ML, we found
>     out this accidentally fixes a bug.
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> index d92c97a..c318eb6 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> @@ -234,7 +234,6 @@ static int mxs_lradc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
>  {
>  	struct mxs_lradc *lradc = iio_priv(iio_dev);
>  	int ret;
> -	unsigned long mask;
>  
>  	if (m != IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -243,12 +242,6 @@ static int mxs_lradc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
>  	if (chan->channel > LRADC_MAX_TOTAL_CHANS)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	/* Validate the channel if it doesn't intersect with reserved chans. */
> -	bitmap_set(&mask, chan->channel, 1);
> -	ret = iio_validate_scan_mask_onehot(iio_dev, &mask);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * See if there is no buffered operation in progess. If there is, simply
>  	 * bail out. This can be improved to support both buffered and raw IO at
> 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2013-07-06  9:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-03 21:25 [PATCH V2] iio: mxs-lradc: Remove useless check in read_raw Marek Vasut
2013-07-04 20:22 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-07-05  8:36   ` Hector Palacios
2013-07-06  9:36 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51D7E504.9010506@kernel.org \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=fabio.estevam@freescale.com \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marex@denx.de \
    --cc=otavio@ossystems.com.br \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).