From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from saturn.retrosnub.co.uk ([178.18.118.26]:58692 "EHLO saturn.retrosnub.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757742Ab3GLUAS (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jul 2013 16:00:18 -0400 Message-ID: <51E06050.4040901@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 21:00:16 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron MIME-Version: 1.0 To: harald@ccbib.org CC: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: humidity sensors References: <51DC4FE0.1080402@kernel.org> <500695c3-bb30-46e7-8fab-3ba32a01a246@email.android.com> <5bb3a4a786b9e02708d0b5dfeb7f570c@imap.cosmopool.net> In-Reply-To: <5bb3a4a786b9e02708d0b5dfeb7f570c@imap.cosmopool.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On 07/11/2013 08:43 PM, harald@ccbib.org wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:46:50 +0100, Jonathan Cameron > wrote: >> Harald Geyer wrote: >>> I didn't look into this in detail yet, but porting the driver to >>> hwmon probably isn't much more work than adding humidity >>> support to IIO. Which way do you prefer? >> >> I don't really mind but as they have been controversial in hwmon perhaps >> iio is a better bet. > > Ok, so I'll prepare a patch to add humidity support and update the > dht11-gpio driver accordingly. > > One (hopefully) last question: Into which subdirectory should the > dht11-gpio driver (temperature and humidity) go? drivers/iio/humidity (even if we get devices that measure it in the other ways, they can share a directory!) > > Harald >