* continuous mode driver for spi device with interrupt
@ 2013-07-30 19:55 Lo
2013-07-30 22:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Lo @ 2013-07-30 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-iio
Hello,
using the iio driver framework I wrote a driver for an eight channel
ADC, connected via SPI and a interrupt line.
In polling mode (reading /sys/bus/iio/..../in_voltageX_raw) everything
works fine, but this access is obviously not way I'd want to use to read
lots of data.
Looking at other drivers (in staging/ kernel v3.2) I think the most
appropriate way is to use the provided sw ring buffer ring_sw.c
I'm not sure if my ring setup is correct, can someone please comment on
this?
My _probe function does the basic setup, inits a waitqueue and requests
the irq line (a gpio):
iio->buffer = iio_sw_rb_allocate(iio);
iio->buffer->access = &ring_sw_access_funcs;
iio->pollfunc = iio_alloc_pollfunc(&iio_pollfunc_store_time,
&my_poll_handler,
IRQF_ONESHOT, //<-not sure about this flag
iio,
"my_consumer%d",//<-where is this for?
iio->id);
iio->buffer->setup_ops = &my_ring_setup_ops;
iio->modes |= INDIO_BUFFER_TRIGGERED;//<-correct mode?
Where my access funcs are:
.preenable = &my_buffer_preenable,
.postenable = &iio_triggered_buffer_postenable,
.predisable = &iio_triggered_buffer_predisable,
.postdisable = &my_buffer_postdisable
where:
preenable just sets
iio->buffer->access->set_bytes_per_datum(iio->buffer, 19);
and enables the irq
postenable disables the irq
My irq handler does basically this:
disable_irq_nosync(irq);
iio_trigger_poll(adc->trig, iio_get_time_ns());
return IRQ_HANDLED;
My poll handler does this:
ring->access->store_to(ring, (u8 *)data, pf->timestamp);
iio_trigger_notify_done(iio->trig);
enable_irq(adc->spi->irq);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
Is the approach of using the sw ring and the interrupt & poll_func more
or less correct?
I've read ring.txt but still I get most of my kernel panics somewhere in
ring of buffer management, so I must be doing something wrong there.
Is any (simple) driver recommended as reference? I see different
approaches in different drivers and I can't test them.
--Lo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: continuous mode driver for spi device with interrupt
2013-07-30 19:55 continuous mode driver for spi device with interrupt Lo
@ 2013-07-30 22:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-07-31 11:22 ` Lo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2013-07-30 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lo; +Cc: linux-iio
On 07/30/13 20:55, Lo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> using the iio driver framework I wrote a driver for an eight channel ADC, connected via SPI and a interrupt line.
> In polling mode (reading /sys/bus/iio/..../in_voltageX_raw) everything works fine, but this access is obviously not way
> I'd want to use to read lots of data.
> Looking at other drivers (in staging/ kernel v3.2) I think the most appropriate way is to use the provided sw ring
> buffer ring_sw.c
> I'm not sure if my ring setup is correct, can someone please comment on this?
>
> My _probe function does the basic setup, inits a waitqueue and requests the irq line (a gpio):
> iio->buffer = iio_sw_rb_allocate(iio);
> iio->buffer->access = &ring_sw_access_funcs;
> iio->pollfunc = iio_alloc_pollfunc(&iio_pollfunc_store_time,
> &my_poll_handler,
> IRQF_ONESHOT, //<-not sure about this flag
> iio,
> "my_consumer%d",//<-where is this for?
Naming for the interrupt. Basically this is a variable number of arguements
function so you can roll in creating the naming string with this call
(in this case the iio->id is the only additional arguement afte the formatting.
> iio->id);
> iio->buffer->setup_ops = &my_ring_setup_ops;
> iio->modes |= INDIO_BUFFER_TRIGGERED;//<-correct mode?
yes
>
> Where my access funcs are:
> .preenable = &my_buffer_preenable,
> .postenable = &iio_triggered_buffer_postenable,
> .predisable = &iio_triggered_buffer_predisable,
> .postdisable = &my_buffer_postdisable
> where:
> preenable just sets iio->buffer->access->set_bytes_per_datum(iio->buffer, 19);
The kfifo always contains aligned data. Hence it will be padded to the largest
sized element. The only way it would correctly be 19 would be to have 19 8 bit
or lower channels. Seems unlikely. Also why doesn't the generic
function work for your case?
> and enables the irq
> postenable disables the irq
>
> My irq handler does basically this:
> disable_irq_nosync(irq);
Don't think you should need this if using the ONESHOT flag as it should be
masked until handled. It's late here though so I might be completly wrong :)
> iio_trigger_poll(adc->trig, iio_get_time_ns());
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
>
> My poll handler does this:
> ring->access->store_to(ring, (u8 *)data, pf->timestamp);
> iio_trigger_notify_done(iio->trig);
> enable_irq(adc->spi->irq);
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
Looks fine.
>
> Is the approach of using the sw ring and the interrupt & poll_func more or less correct?
> I've read ring.txt but still I get most of my kernel panics somewhere in ring of buffer management, so I must be doing
> something wrong there.
> Is any (simple) driver recommended as reference? I see different approaches in different drivers and I can't test them.
Take a look at the dummy driver (still in drivers/staging/iio) as that can be tested
without any hardware. (iio_simple_dummy
>
> --Lo
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: continuous mode driver for spi device with interrupt
2013-07-30 22:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
@ 2013-07-31 11:22 ` Lo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Lo @ 2013-07-31 11:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Cameron, linux-iio
Hello Jonathan,
On 07/31/2013 12:28 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 07/30/13 20:55, Lo wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> Where my access funcs are:
>> .preenable = &my_buffer_preenable,
>> .postenable = &iio_triggered_buffer_postenable,
>> .predisable = &iio_triggered_buffer_predisable,
>> .postdisable = &my_buffer_postdisable
>> where:
>> preenable just sets iio->buffer->access->set_bytes_per_datum(iio->buffer, 19);
>
> The kfifo always contains aligned data. Hence it will be padded to the largest
> sized element. The only way it would correctly be 19 would be to have 19 8 bit
> or lower channels. Seems unlikely. Also why doesn't the generic
> function work for your case?
>
I took a look at the dummy driver, I switched to the generic function.
>> and enables the irq
>> postenable disables the irq
>>
>> My irq handler does basically this:
>> disable_irq_nosync(irq);
> Don't think you should need this if using the ONESHOT flag as it should be
> masked until handled. It's late here though so I might be completly wrong :)
>
Then I assume my irq handler should not return IRQ_HANDLED, but
IRQ_WAKE_THREAD instead, right?
>> iio_trigger_poll(adc->trig, iio_get_time_ns());
>> return IRQ_HANDLED;
>>
>> My poll handler does this:
>> ring->access->store_to(ring, (u8 *)data, pf->timestamp);
>> iio_trigger_notify_done(iio->trig);
>> enable_irq(adc->spi->irq);
>> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> Looks fine.
> Take a look at the dummy driver (still in drivers/staging/iio) as that can be tested
> without any hardware. (iio_simple_dummy)
Thanks! that's what I need, but I kept looking in the adc related stuff.
I've compiled the dummy driver, but apparently my assumed way of using
the buffer mode is wrong. My buffer length is 0, bytes per datum also.
I compiled the generic_buffer.c but don't know how to use that on the
dummy device either. I can run it and by reading the source I saw I must
pass the iiodevice name (./buftest -n iio_dummy_part_no ), but I've got
no idea what I should pass as trigger argument. Btw: which arguments are
required/optional?
--Lo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-07-31 11:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-07-30 19:55 continuous mode driver for spi device with interrupt Lo
2013-07-30 22:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-07-31 11:22 ` Lo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).