From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <521E43BF.3000504@linutronix.de> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 20:38:55 +0200 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zubair Lutfullah : CC: jic23@cam.ac.uk, lee.jones@linaro.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: ti_am335x_adc: Add continuous sampling support References: <1377470724-15710-1-git-send-email-zubair.lutfullah@gmail.com> <1377470724-15710-3-git-send-email-zubair.lutfullah@gmail.com> <20130828141835.GD14111@linutronix.de> <20130828182249.GB3580@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20130828182249.GB3580@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 List-ID: On 08/28/2013 08:22 PM, Zubair Lutfullah : wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 04:18:35PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >> * Zubair Lutfullah | 2013-08-25 23:45:24 [+0100]: >> >>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c >>> index a952538..ae2202b 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c >>> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c >> … >> >>> +static struct iio_trigger *tiadc_iio_allocate_trigger(struct iio_dev *indio_dev) > ... >>> + trig = iio_trigger_alloc("%s-dev%d", indio_dev->name, indio_dev->id); >>> + if (trig == NULL) >>> + return NULL; >>> + > ... >>> + ret = iio_trigger_register(trig); >>> + if (ret) >> >> shouldn't you free the trigger / undo iio_trigger_alloc() here? >> >>> + return NULL; >>> + > ... > Possible. It's done in the probe section just > to keep error handling bunched there. The caller of iio_trigger *tiadc_iio_allocate_trigger() should not cleanup after it in case of a half failure. The function itself should be in charge of it. However you never assign the pointer so you leak the memory here. >> >>> >>> static const char * const chan_name_ain[] = { >>> @@ -220,7 +394,8 @@ static int tiadc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>> sizeof(struct tiadc_device)); >>> if (indio_dev == NULL) { >>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to allocate iio device\n"); >>> - return -ENOMEM; >>> + err = -ENOMEM; >>> + goto err_ret; >> Why the jump instead of leave right away? >> >>> } > Again. Error handling all in one place. But you simply leave at the end of the function, no error handling is done / required if you leave here. So this a zero change and has nothing to do with the "continuous sampling support" support. Sebastian