* [PULL] IIO fixes for 3.11 - set 4
@ 2013-08-29 21:22 Jonathan Cameron
2013-08-29 21:32 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2013-08-29 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH; +Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
The following changes since commit d8dfad3876e4386666b759da3c833d62fb8b2267:
Linux 3.11-rc7 (2013-08-25 17:43:22 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git tags/iio-fixes-for-3.11d
for you to fetch changes up to 947b8ec78610fdfd891da249629f79cfa8e5da57:
iio: at91: fix adc_clk overflow (2013-08-29 21:42:11 +0100)
----------------------------------------------------------------
4th round of fixes for IIO in the 3.11 series.
Another one patch pull request, this one for an overflow issue that
can occur in the at91 adc driver.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Josh Wu (1):
iio: at91: fix adc_clk overflow
drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PULL] IIO fixes for 3.11 - set 4 2013-08-29 21:22 [PULL] IIO fixes for 3.11 - set 4 Jonathan Cameron @ 2013-08-29 21:32 ` Greg KH 2013-08-31 18:09 ` Jonathan Cameron 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2013-08-29 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jonathan Cameron; +Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:22:33PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > The following changes since commit d8dfad3876e4386666b759da3c833d62fb8b2267: > > Linux 3.11-rc7 (2013-08-25 17:43:22 -0700) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git tags/iio-fixes-for-3.11d > > for you to fetch changes up to 947b8ec78610fdfd891da249629f79cfa8e5da57: > > iio: at91: fix adc_clk overflow (2013-08-29 21:42:11 +0100) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > 4th round of fixes for IIO in the 3.11 series. > > Another one patch pull request, this one for an overflow issue that > can occur in the at91 adc driver. How "necessary" is this for 3.11? Is it something that a user can hit today? Is it a regression from 3.10? Is it for a new driver? It's really late in the 3.11 cycle for me to want to send anything to Linus except for "this fixes a major issue" type patches. Can we just tag this for stable and have it show up in 3.11 after 3.12-rc1 is out? thanks, greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PULL] IIO fixes for 3.11 - set 4 2013-08-29 21:32 ` Greg KH @ 2013-08-31 18:09 ` Jonathan Cameron 2013-09-02 7:23 ` Josh Wu 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2013-08-31 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg KH; +Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Josh Wu, Maxime Ripard On 08/29/13 22:32, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:22:33PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >> The following changes since commit d8dfad3876e4386666b759da3c833d62fb8b2267: >> >> Linux 3.11-rc7 (2013-08-25 17:43:22 -0700) >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git tags/iio-fixes-for-3.11d >> >> for you to fetch changes up to 947b8ec78610fdfd891da249629f79cfa8e5da57: >> >> iio: at91: fix adc_clk overflow (2013-08-29 21:42:11 +0100) >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> 4th round of fixes for IIO in the 3.11 series. >> >> Another one patch pull request, this one for an overflow issue that >> can occur in the at91 adc driver. > > How "necessary" is this for 3.11? > Is it something that a user can hit today? > Is it a regression from 3.10? > Is it for a new driver? No > > It's really late in the 3.11 cycle for me to want to send anything to > Linus except for "this fixes a major issue" type patches. Can we just > tag this for stable and have it show up in 3.11 after 3.12-rc1 is out? Fine by me - have cc'd Josh and Maxime as they should be able to answer the above better than me. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PULL] IIO fixes for 3.11 - set 4 2013-08-31 18:09 ` Jonathan Cameron @ 2013-09-02 7:23 ` Josh Wu 2013-09-21 23:44 ` Greg KH 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Josh Wu @ 2013-09-02 7:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jonathan Cameron; +Cc: Greg KH, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Maxime Ripard Hi, Jonathan and Greg On 9/1/2013 2:09 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On 08/29/13 22:32, Greg KH wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:22:33PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >>> The following changes since commit d8dfad3876e4386666b759da3c833d62fb8b2267: >>> >>> Linux 3.11-rc7 (2013-08-25 17:43:22 -0700) >>> >>> are available in the git repository at: >>> >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git tags/iio-fixes-for-3.11d >>> >>> for you to fetch changes up to 947b8ec78610fdfd891da249629f79cfa8e5da57: >>> >>> iio: at91: fix adc_clk overflow (2013-08-29 21:42:11 +0100) >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> 4th round of fixes for IIO in the 3.11 series. >>> >>> Another one patch pull request, this one for an overflow issue that >>> can occur in the at91 adc driver. >> How "necessary" is this for 3.11? >> Is it something that a user can hit today? The overflow only happened when user use a very high adc clock with a big start-up time. And our default start-up time in DTS is a low value (40ns). So I think it is rare case. >> Is it a regression from 3.10? No. >> Is it for a new driver? No. > No >> It's really late in the 3.11 cycle for me to want to send anything to >> Linus except for "this fixes a major issue" type patches. Can we just >> tag this for stable and have it show up in 3.11 after 3.12-rc1 is out? > Fine by me - have cc'd Josh and Maxime as they should be able to answer > the above better than me. So I am fine with this. > >> thanks, >> >> greg k-h >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> Best Regards, Josh Wu ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PULL] IIO fixes for 3.11 - set 4 2013-09-02 7:23 ` Josh Wu @ 2013-09-21 23:44 ` Greg KH 2013-09-22 17:31 ` Jonathan Cameron 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2013-09-21 23:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Josh Wu; +Cc: Jonathan Cameron, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Maxime Ripard On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 03:23:04PM +0800, Josh Wu wrote: > Hi, Jonathan and Greg > > On 9/1/2013 2:09 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On 08/29/13 22:32, Greg KH wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:22:33PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > >>> The following changes since commit d8dfad3876e4386666b759da3c833d62fb8b2267: > >>> > >>> Linux 3.11-rc7 (2013-08-25 17:43:22 -0700) > >>> > >>> are available in the git repository at: > >>> > >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git tags/iio-fixes-for-3.11d > >>> > >>> for you to fetch changes up to 947b8ec78610fdfd891da249629f79cfa8e5da57: > >>> > >>> iio: at91: fix adc_clk overflow (2013-08-29 21:42:11 +0100) > >>> > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> 4th round of fixes for IIO in the 3.11 series. > >>> > >>> Another one patch pull request, this one for an overflow issue that > >>> can occur in the at91 adc driver. > >> How "necessary" is this for 3.11? > >> Is it something that a user can hit today? > > The overflow only happened when user use a very high adc clock with a > big start-up time. > And our default start-up time in DTS is a low value (40ns). So I think > it is rare case. > > >> Is it a regression from 3.10? > > No. > > >> Is it for a new driver? > > No. > > > No > >> It's really late in the 3.11 cycle for me to want to send anything to > >> Linus except for "this fixes a major issue" type patches. Can we just > >> tag this for stable and have it show up in 3.11 after 3.12-rc1 is out? > > Fine by me - have cc'd Josh and Maxime as they should be able to answer > > the above better than me. > > So I am fine with this. What ever happened with this, did I forget to pull them in, or Jonathan, did you redo them in the last set of patches you sent to me? thanks, greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PULL] IIO fixes for 3.11 - set 4 2013-09-21 23:44 ` Greg KH @ 2013-09-22 17:31 ` Jonathan Cameron 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2013-09-22 17:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg KH; +Cc: Josh Wu, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Maxime Ripard On 09/22/13 00:44, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 03:23:04PM +0800, Josh Wu wrote: >> Hi, Jonathan and Greg >> >> On 9/1/2013 2:09 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >>> On 08/29/13 22:32, Greg KH wrote: >>>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:22:33PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >>>>> The following changes since commit d8dfad3876e4386666b759da3c833d62fb8b2267: >>>>> >>>>> Linux 3.11-rc7 (2013-08-25 17:43:22 -0700) >>>>> >>>>> are available in the git repository at: >>>>> >>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git tags/iio-fixes-for-3.11d >>>>> >>>>> for you to fetch changes up to 947b8ec78610fdfd891da249629f79cfa8e5da57: >>>>> >>>>> iio: at91: fix adc_clk overflow (2013-08-29 21:42:11 +0100) >>>>> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> 4th round of fixes for IIO in the 3.11 series. >>>>> >>>>> Another one patch pull request, this one for an overflow issue that >>>>> can occur in the at91 adc driver. >>>> How "necessary" is this for 3.11? >>>> Is it something that a user can hit today? >> >> The overflow only happened when user use a very high adc clock with a >> big start-up time. >> And our default start-up time in DTS is a low value (40ns). So I think >> it is rare case. >> >>>> Is it a regression from 3.10? >> >> No. >> >>>> Is it for a new driver? >> >> No. >> >>> No >>>> It's really late in the 3.11 cycle for me to want to send anything to >>>> Linus except for "this fixes a major issue" type patches. Can we just >>>> tag this for stable and have it show up in 3.11 after 3.12-rc1 is out? >>> Fine by me - have cc'd Josh and Maxime as they should be able to answer >>> the above better than me. >> >> So I am fine with this. > > What ever happened with this, did I forget to pull them in, or Jonathan, > did you redo them in the last set of patches you sent to me? Sorry, I forgot about this and as it was still queued up you got it in the set you pull yesterday. Oops, but I guess that worked fine. Jonathan > > thanks, > > greg k-h > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-09-22 16:30 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2013-08-29 21:22 [PULL] IIO fixes for 3.11 - set 4 Jonathan Cameron 2013-08-29 21:32 ` Greg KH 2013-08-31 18:09 ` Jonathan Cameron 2013-09-02 7:23 ` Josh Wu 2013-09-21 23:44 ` Greg KH 2013-09-22 17:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).