From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>,
"linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PULL] IIO fixes for 3.11 - set 4
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 18:31:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <523F295B.606@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130921234429.GA4272@kroah.com>
On 09/22/13 00:44, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 03:23:04PM +0800, Josh Wu wrote:
>> Hi, Jonathan and Greg
>>
>> On 9/1/2013 2:09 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>> On 08/29/13 22:32, Greg KH wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:22:33PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>>>> The following changes since commit d8dfad3876e4386666b759da3c833d62fb8b2267:
>>>>>
>>>>> Linux 3.11-rc7 (2013-08-25 17:43:22 -0700)
>>>>>
>>>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>>>
>>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git tags/iio-fixes-for-3.11d
>>>>>
>>>>> for you to fetch changes up to 947b8ec78610fdfd891da249629f79cfa8e5da57:
>>>>>
>>>>> iio: at91: fix adc_clk overflow (2013-08-29 21:42:11 +0100)
>>>>>
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> 4th round of fixes for IIO in the 3.11 series.
>>>>>
>>>>> Another one patch pull request, this one for an overflow issue that
>>>>> can occur in the at91 adc driver.
>>>> How "necessary" is this for 3.11?
>>>> Is it something that a user can hit today?
>>
>> The overflow only happened when user use a very high adc clock with a
>> big start-up time.
>> And our default start-up time in DTS is a low value (40ns). So I think
>> it is rare case.
>>
>>>> Is it a regression from 3.10?
>>
>> No.
>>
>>>> Is it for a new driver?
>>
>> No.
>>
>>> No
>>>> It's really late in the 3.11 cycle for me to want to send anything to
>>>> Linus except for "this fixes a major issue" type patches. Can we just
>>>> tag this for stable and have it show up in 3.11 after 3.12-rc1 is out?
>>> Fine by me - have cc'd Josh and Maxime as they should be able to answer
>>> the above better than me.
>>
>> So I am fine with this.
>
> What ever happened with this, did I forget to pull them in, or Jonathan,
> did you redo them in the last set of patches you sent to me?
Sorry, I forgot about this and as it was still queued up you got it in the set
you pull yesterday.
Oops, but I guess that worked fine.
Jonathan
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-22 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-29 21:22 [PULL] IIO fixes for 3.11 - set 4 Jonathan Cameron
2013-08-29 21:32 ` Greg KH
2013-08-31 18:09 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-09-02 7:23 ` Josh Wu
2013-09-21 23:44 ` Greg KH
2013-09-22 17:31 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=523F295B.606@kernel.org \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=josh.wu@atmel.com \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).