* [PULL] IIO fixes for 3.11 - set 4
@ 2013-08-29 21:22 Jonathan Cameron
2013-08-29 21:32 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2013-08-29 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH; +Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
The following changes since commit d8dfad3876e4386666b759da3c833d62fb8b2267:
Linux 3.11-rc7 (2013-08-25 17:43:22 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git tags/iio-fixes-for-3.11d
for you to fetch changes up to 947b8ec78610fdfd891da249629f79cfa8e5da57:
iio: at91: fix adc_clk overflow (2013-08-29 21:42:11 +0100)
----------------------------------------------------------------
4th round of fixes for IIO in the 3.11 series.
Another one patch pull request, this one for an overflow issue that
can occur in the at91 adc driver.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Josh Wu (1):
iio: at91: fix adc_clk overflow
drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PULL] IIO fixes for 3.11 - set 4
2013-08-29 21:22 [PULL] IIO fixes for 3.11 - set 4 Jonathan Cameron
@ 2013-08-29 21:32 ` Greg KH
2013-08-31 18:09 ` Jonathan Cameron
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2013-08-29 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Cameron; +Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:22:33PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> The following changes since commit d8dfad3876e4386666b759da3c833d62fb8b2267:
>
> Linux 3.11-rc7 (2013-08-25 17:43:22 -0700)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git tags/iio-fixes-for-3.11d
>
> for you to fetch changes up to 947b8ec78610fdfd891da249629f79cfa8e5da57:
>
> iio: at91: fix adc_clk overflow (2013-08-29 21:42:11 +0100)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> 4th round of fixes for IIO in the 3.11 series.
>
> Another one patch pull request, this one for an overflow issue that
> can occur in the at91 adc driver.
How "necessary" is this for 3.11? Is it something that a user can hit
today? Is it a regression from 3.10? Is it for a new driver?
It's really late in the 3.11 cycle for me to want to send anything to
Linus except for "this fixes a major issue" type patches. Can we just
tag this for stable and have it show up in 3.11 after 3.12-rc1 is out?
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PULL] IIO fixes for 3.11 - set 4
2013-08-29 21:32 ` Greg KH
@ 2013-08-31 18:09 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-09-02 7:23 ` Josh Wu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2013-08-31 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH; +Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Josh Wu, Maxime Ripard
On 08/29/13 22:32, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:22:33PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> The following changes since commit d8dfad3876e4386666b759da3c833d62fb8b2267:
>>
>> Linux 3.11-rc7 (2013-08-25 17:43:22 -0700)
>>
>> are available in the git repository at:
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git tags/iio-fixes-for-3.11d
>>
>> for you to fetch changes up to 947b8ec78610fdfd891da249629f79cfa8e5da57:
>>
>> iio: at91: fix adc_clk overflow (2013-08-29 21:42:11 +0100)
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> 4th round of fixes for IIO in the 3.11 series.
>>
>> Another one patch pull request, this one for an overflow issue that
>> can occur in the at91 adc driver.
>
> How "necessary" is this for 3.11?
> Is it something that a user can hit today?
> Is it a regression from 3.10?
> Is it for a new driver?
No
>
> It's really late in the 3.11 cycle for me to want to send anything to
> Linus except for "this fixes a major issue" type patches. Can we just
> tag this for stable and have it show up in 3.11 after 3.12-rc1 is out?
Fine by me - have cc'd Josh and Maxime as they should be able to answer
the above better than me.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PULL] IIO fixes for 3.11 - set 4
2013-08-31 18:09 ` Jonathan Cameron
@ 2013-09-02 7:23 ` Josh Wu
2013-09-21 23:44 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Josh Wu @ 2013-09-02 7:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Cameron; +Cc: Greg KH, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Maxime Ripard
Hi, Jonathan and Greg
On 9/1/2013 2:09 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 08/29/13 22:32, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:22:33PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>> The following changes since commit d8dfad3876e4386666b759da3c833d62fb8b2267:
>>>
>>> Linux 3.11-rc7 (2013-08-25 17:43:22 -0700)
>>>
>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git tags/iio-fixes-for-3.11d
>>>
>>> for you to fetch changes up to 947b8ec78610fdfd891da249629f79cfa8e5da57:
>>>
>>> iio: at91: fix adc_clk overflow (2013-08-29 21:42:11 +0100)
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 4th round of fixes for IIO in the 3.11 series.
>>>
>>> Another one patch pull request, this one for an overflow issue that
>>> can occur in the at91 adc driver.
>> How "necessary" is this for 3.11?
>> Is it something that a user can hit today?
The overflow only happened when user use a very high adc clock with a
big start-up time.
And our default start-up time in DTS is a low value (40ns). So I think
it is rare case.
>> Is it a regression from 3.10?
No.
>> Is it for a new driver?
No.
> No
>> It's really late in the 3.11 cycle for me to want to send anything to
>> Linus except for "this fixes a major issue" type patches. Can we just
>> tag this for stable and have it show up in 3.11 after 3.12-rc1 is out?
> Fine by me - have cc'd Josh and Maxime as they should be able to answer
> the above better than me.
So I am fine with this.
>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
Best Regards,
Josh Wu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PULL] IIO fixes for 3.11 - set 4
2013-09-02 7:23 ` Josh Wu
@ 2013-09-21 23:44 ` Greg KH
2013-09-22 17:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2013-09-21 23:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Josh Wu; +Cc: Jonathan Cameron, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Maxime Ripard
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 03:23:04PM +0800, Josh Wu wrote:
> Hi, Jonathan and Greg
>
> On 9/1/2013 2:09 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On 08/29/13 22:32, Greg KH wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:22:33PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> >>> The following changes since commit d8dfad3876e4386666b759da3c833d62fb8b2267:
> >>>
> >>> Linux 3.11-rc7 (2013-08-25 17:43:22 -0700)
> >>>
> >>> are available in the git repository at:
> >>>
> >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git tags/iio-fixes-for-3.11d
> >>>
> >>> for you to fetch changes up to 947b8ec78610fdfd891da249629f79cfa8e5da57:
> >>>
> >>> iio: at91: fix adc_clk overflow (2013-08-29 21:42:11 +0100)
> >>>
> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> 4th round of fixes for IIO in the 3.11 series.
> >>>
> >>> Another one patch pull request, this one for an overflow issue that
> >>> can occur in the at91 adc driver.
> >> How "necessary" is this for 3.11?
> >> Is it something that a user can hit today?
>
> The overflow only happened when user use a very high adc clock with a
> big start-up time.
> And our default start-up time in DTS is a low value (40ns). So I think
> it is rare case.
>
> >> Is it a regression from 3.10?
>
> No.
>
> >> Is it for a new driver?
>
> No.
>
> > No
> >> It's really late in the 3.11 cycle for me to want to send anything to
> >> Linus except for "this fixes a major issue" type patches. Can we just
> >> tag this for stable and have it show up in 3.11 after 3.12-rc1 is out?
> > Fine by me - have cc'd Josh and Maxime as they should be able to answer
> > the above better than me.
>
> So I am fine with this.
What ever happened with this, did I forget to pull them in, or Jonathan,
did you redo them in the last set of patches you sent to me?
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PULL] IIO fixes for 3.11 - set 4
2013-09-21 23:44 ` Greg KH
@ 2013-09-22 17:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2013-09-22 17:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH; +Cc: Josh Wu, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Maxime Ripard
On 09/22/13 00:44, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 03:23:04PM +0800, Josh Wu wrote:
>> Hi, Jonathan and Greg
>>
>> On 9/1/2013 2:09 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>> On 08/29/13 22:32, Greg KH wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:22:33PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>>>> The following changes since commit d8dfad3876e4386666b759da3c833d62fb8b2267:
>>>>>
>>>>> Linux 3.11-rc7 (2013-08-25 17:43:22 -0700)
>>>>>
>>>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>>>
>>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git tags/iio-fixes-for-3.11d
>>>>>
>>>>> for you to fetch changes up to 947b8ec78610fdfd891da249629f79cfa8e5da57:
>>>>>
>>>>> iio: at91: fix adc_clk overflow (2013-08-29 21:42:11 +0100)
>>>>>
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> 4th round of fixes for IIO in the 3.11 series.
>>>>>
>>>>> Another one patch pull request, this one for an overflow issue that
>>>>> can occur in the at91 adc driver.
>>>> How "necessary" is this for 3.11?
>>>> Is it something that a user can hit today?
>>
>> The overflow only happened when user use a very high adc clock with a
>> big start-up time.
>> And our default start-up time in DTS is a low value (40ns). So I think
>> it is rare case.
>>
>>>> Is it a regression from 3.10?
>>
>> No.
>>
>>>> Is it for a new driver?
>>
>> No.
>>
>>> No
>>>> It's really late in the 3.11 cycle for me to want to send anything to
>>>> Linus except for "this fixes a major issue" type patches. Can we just
>>>> tag this for stable and have it show up in 3.11 after 3.12-rc1 is out?
>>> Fine by me - have cc'd Josh and Maxime as they should be able to answer
>>> the above better than me.
>>
>> So I am fine with this.
>
> What ever happened with this, did I forget to pull them in, or Jonathan,
> did you redo them in the last set of patches you sent to me?
Sorry, I forgot about this and as it was still queued up you got it in the set
you pull yesterday.
Oops, but I guess that worked fine.
Jonathan
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-09-22 16:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-08-29 21:22 [PULL] IIO fixes for 3.11 - set 4 Jonathan Cameron
2013-08-29 21:32 ` Greg KH
2013-08-31 18:09 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-09-02 7:23 ` Josh Wu
2013-09-21 23:44 ` Greg KH
2013-09-22 17:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).