From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from saturn.retrosnub.co.uk ([178.18.118.26]:42190 "EHLO saturn.retrosnub.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752189Ab3IVQav (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:30:51 -0400 Message-ID: <523F295B.606@kernel.org> Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 18:31:07 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg KH CC: Josh Wu , "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" , Maxime Ripard Subject: Re: [PULL] IIO fixes for 3.11 - set 4 References: <521FBB99.3040205@kernel.org> <20130829213234.GA24433@kroah.com> <52223142.2070106@kernel.org> <52243CD8.7040308@atmel.com> <20130921234429.GA4272@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20130921234429.GA4272@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On 09/22/13 00:44, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 03:23:04PM +0800, Josh Wu wrote: >> Hi, Jonathan and Greg >> >> On 9/1/2013 2:09 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >>> On 08/29/13 22:32, Greg KH wrote: >>>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:22:33PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >>>>> The following changes since commit d8dfad3876e4386666b759da3c833d62fb8b2267: >>>>> >>>>> Linux 3.11-rc7 (2013-08-25 17:43:22 -0700) >>>>> >>>>> are available in the git repository at: >>>>> >>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git tags/iio-fixes-for-3.11d >>>>> >>>>> for you to fetch changes up to 947b8ec78610fdfd891da249629f79cfa8e5da57: >>>>> >>>>> iio: at91: fix adc_clk overflow (2013-08-29 21:42:11 +0100) >>>>> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> 4th round of fixes for IIO in the 3.11 series. >>>>> >>>>> Another one patch pull request, this one for an overflow issue that >>>>> can occur in the at91 adc driver. >>>> How "necessary" is this for 3.11? >>>> Is it something that a user can hit today? >> >> The overflow only happened when user use a very high adc clock with a >> big start-up time. >> And our default start-up time in DTS is a low value (40ns). So I think >> it is rare case. >> >>>> Is it a regression from 3.10? >> >> No. >> >>>> Is it for a new driver? >> >> No. >> >>> No >>>> It's really late in the 3.11 cycle for me to want to send anything to >>>> Linus except for "this fixes a major issue" type patches. Can we just >>>> tag this for stable and have it show up in 3.11 after 3.12-rc1 is out? >>> Fine by me - have cc'd Josh and Maxime as they should be able to answer >>> the above better than me. >> >> So I am fine with this. > > What ever happened with this, did I forget to pull them in, or Jonathan, > did you redo them in the last set of patches you sent to me? Sorry, I forgot about this and as it was still queued up you got it in the set you pull yesterday. Oops, but I guess that worked fine. Jonathan > > thanks, > > greg k-h >