From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Denis CIOCCA To: Jonathan Cameron , Maxime Ripard Cc: Shawn Guo , "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Alexandre Belloni , Brian Lilly , Brent-Crosby , Jim Wall Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 09:37:26 +0100 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] DT support for ST micro accelerometers and gyroscopes Message-ID: <52930C46.801@st.com> References: <1384876234-1211-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <528DF164.8060009@st.com> <20131121131402.GF1029@lukather> <52926901.9080004@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <52926901.9080004@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 List-ID: Hi Jonathan, >> Yes, it is, but only for i2c as far as I'm aware, and usually the DT com= patibles are with - as a separator (I >> looked into the ePAPR, but couldn't get any explanations or requirements= on this, even though it's used in all of >> their examples) > In other discussions, where the defacto i2c device tree bindings have > been followed, the conclusion has been that to change to a - from _ > would result in userspace ABI changes, so whilst no one wants _ > the discussion has concluded we can't really avoid it. Ok, I understood the point. Thanks, Denis=