From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
To: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@gnudd.com>
Cc: john3909@gmail.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
broonie@kernel.org, flatmax@flatmax.org
Subject: Re: DMA sampling and IIO
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 22:38:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52F400D7.7050204@metafoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140206211637.GA14525@mail.gnudd.com>
On 02/06/2014 10:16 PM, Alessandro Rubini wrote:
>>> ZIO already supports dma. And mmaping the buffer from user space. It
>>> is in the design since inception, and in the code since Feb 2012 (git
>>> log says).
>>
>> I know. And I did study the ZIO DMA code (among other things),
>> before I implemented the IIO DMA code. As you might remember from
>> our last discussion, my preference is to add the features that are
>> in ZIO but not in IIO to IIO and then ditch ZIO instead of having
>> two frameworks for the class of devices.
>
> I remember. And we both know that the class of devices that ZIO already
> supports cannot be supported by IIO, unless many incompatible changes
> are made (sub-nanosecond timestamps, symmetric input and output,
> hot-swap of buffer and trigger type, ...).
>
I still don't see why it is necessary to make incompatible changes to IIO to
support this. There is nothing wrong with extending the API, while staying
backwards compatible.
> I'm happy all accelerometers have the same interface to user space,
> this is definitely useful. But that's clearly not the same class of
> devices.
>
>> and then ditch ZIO
>
> How can you "ditch" something you don't use? Or is your employer
> currently using zio while helping iio catch up?
I meant in general.
>
> Our users will not stop using it, despite your desire, because it
> already serves them pretty well: 100MS ADC, with DMA and mmap, all
> sysfs-based, completely run-time configurable, and v2.6.24..v3.12 (13
> untested yet).
I have no desire to stop anybody from stopping using ZIO. But my recommendation
is to work towards a unified framework. The sooner the switch is made the
easier the migration path will be.
I think we have systems with 4x 250MS ADCs also doing DMA and mmap and
streaming over the network[1]. All with IIO, so again, there _is_ a huge
overlap of the classes of devices supported by both IIO and ZIO.
-Lars
[1] https://wiki.analog.com/resources/fpga/xilinx/fmc/ad-fmcjesdadc1-ebz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-06 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-05 18:42 DMA sampling and IIO John Syn
2014-02-06 9:56 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-02-06 19:43 ` John Syn
2014-02-06 21:15 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-02-07 13:20 ` Mark Brown
2014-02-07 22:19 ` John Syn
2014-09-10 22:19 ` John Syn
2014-09-10 22:43 ` John Syn
2014-09-17 19:53 ` Mark Brown
2014-09-18 4:06 ` John Syn
2014-02-06 20:53 ` Alessandro Rubini
2014-02-06 21:02 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-02-06 21:16 ` Alessandro Rubini
2014-02-06 21:38 ` Lars-Peter Clausen [this message]
2014-02-07 18:18 ` John Syn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52F400D7.7050204@metafoo.de \
--to=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=flatmax@flatmax.org \
--cc=john3909@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rubini@gnudd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).