From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.19.201]:60664 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752671AbaFWSLP (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jun 2014 14:11:15 -0400 Message-ID: <53A86E3A.6000400@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 19:13:14 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Denis Carikli , Shawn Guo , Samuel Ortiz , Dmitry Torokhov , Fabio Estevam , Peter Meerwald , Hartmut Knaack CC: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eric_B=E9nard?= , Sascha Hauer , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Lee Jones , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Lars-Peter Clausen , Markus Pargmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] iio: adc: fsl,imx25-gcq driver References: <1402910933-20534-1-git-send-email-denis@eukrea.com> <1402910933-20534-3-git-send-email-denis@eukrea.com> <53A563B0.60708@kernel.org> <53A85922.1000209@eukrea.com> In-Reply-To: <53A85922.1000209@eukrea.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On 23/06/14 17:43, Denis Carikli wrote: > On 06/21/2014 12:51 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >>> +static irqreturn_t mx25_gcq_irq(int irq, void *data) >>> +{ >>> + struct mx25_gcq_priv *priv = data; >>> + u32 stats; >> Not that much in here, but perhaps still makes sense for this to be a >> threaded >> irq? > What would be the advantage of converting it to be a threaded IRQ? > > I guess that there will be no use of IRQF_SHARED and that only this driver will have to handle the GCQ IRQ in the future. > Fair enough. Was more of an idle thought that anything else!