From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] iio: buffer: Coalesce adjacent demux table entries
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 16:14:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53CBDCE1.6020403@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1405612789-27964-4-git-send-email-lars@metafoo.de>
On 17/07/14 16:59, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> When copying multiple multiple samples that are adjacent in both the source as
> well as the destination buffer, instead of creating a new demux table entry for
> each sample just increase the length of the previous entry by the size of the
> new sample. This makes the demuxing process slightly more efficient.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Nice. Will hold these last two until the first one is in and we have decided
what to do about the second one.
J
> ---
> drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> index 5063703..779e5b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> @@ -942,13 +942,34 @@ int iio_push_to_buffers(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, const void *data)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iio_push_to_buffers);
>
> +static int iio_buffer_add_demux(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> + struct iio_demux_table **p, unsigned int in_loc, unsigned int out_loc,
> + unsigned int length)
> +{
> +
> + if (*p && (*p)->from + (*p)->length == in_loc &&
> + (*p)->to + (*p)->length == out_loc) {
> + (*p)->length += length;
> + } else {
> + *p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (*p == NULL)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + (*p)->from = in_loc;
> + (*p)->to = out_loc;
> + (*p)->length = length;
> + list_add_tail(&(*p)->l, &buffer->demux_list);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int iio_buffer_update_demux(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> struct iio_buffer *buffer)
> {
> const struct iio_chan_spec *ch;
> int ret, in_ind = -1, out_ind, length;
> unsigned in_loc = 0, out_loc = 0;
> - struct iio_demux_table *p;
> + struct iio_demux_table *p = NULL;
>
> /* Clear out any old demux */
> iio_buffer_demux_free(buffer);
> @@ -981,11 +1002,6 @@ static int iio_buffer_update_demux(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> /* Make sure we are aligned */
> in_loc = roundup(in_loc, length) + length;
> }
> - p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (p == NULL) {
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> - goto error_clear_mux_table;
> - }
> ch = iio_find_channel_from_si(indio_dev, in_ind);
> if (ch->scan_type.repeat > 1)
> length = ch->scan_type.storagebits / 8 *
> @@ -994,20 +1010,14 @@ static int iio_buffer_update_demux(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> length = ch->scan_type.storagebits / 8;
> out_loc = roundup(out_loc, length);
> in_loc = roundup(in_loc, length);
> - p->from = in_loc;
> - p->to = out_loc;
> - p->length = length;
> - list_add_tail(&p->l, &buffer->demux_list);
> + ret = iio_buffer_add_demux(buffer, &p, in_loc, out_loc, length);
> + if (ret)
> + goto error_clear_mux_table;
> out_loc += length;
> in_loc += length;
> }
> /* Relies on scan_timestamp being last */
> if (buffer->scan_timestamp) {
> - p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (p == NULL) {
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> - goto error_clear_mux_table;
> - }
> ch = iio_find_channel_from_si(indio_dev,
> indio_dev->scan_index_timestamp);
> if (ch->scan_type.repeat > 1)
> @@ -1017,10 +1027,9 @@ static int iio_buffer_update_demux(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> length = ch->scan_type.storagebits / 8;
> out_loc = roundup(out_loc, length);
> in_loc = roundup(in_loc, length);
> - p->from = in_loc;
> - p->to = out_loc;
> - p->length = length;
> - list_add_tail(&p->l, &buffer->demux_list);
> + ret = iio_buffer_add_demux(buffer, &p, in_loc, out_loc, length);
> + if (ret)
> + goto error_clear_mux_table;
> out_loc += length;
> in_loc += length;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-20 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-17 15:59 [PATCH 1/4] iio: buffer: Fix demux table creation Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-07-17 15:59 ` [PATCH 2/4] iio: buffer: Use roundup() instead of ALIGN() Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-07-20 15:08 ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-07-21 8:46 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-07-27 16:45 ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-07-17 15:59 ` [PATCH 3/4] iio: buffer: Use roundup() instead of open-coding it Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-07-27 18:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-07-17 15:59 ` [PATCH 4/4] iio: buffer: Coalesce adjacent demux table entries Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-07-20 15:14 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2014-08-01 17:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-07-20 14:57 ` [PATCH 1/4] iio: buffer: Fix demux table creation Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53CBDCE1.6020403@kernel.org \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).