From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] iio: accel: kxcjk-1013: Set adjustable range
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 16:04:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53D190E1.6050504@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53CBE429.3070702@kernel.org>
On 07/20/2014 08:45 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 17/07/14 01:42, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
>> This chip can support 3 different ranges. Allowing range specification.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
> A few minor suggestions. Basically fine though.
>> ---
>> drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c | 80
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
>> b/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
>> index 4912143..975f8a6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
>> @@ -70,6 +70,10 @@
>> #define KXCJK1013_REG_INT_REG1_BIT_IEA BIT(4)
>> #define KXCJK1013_REG_INT_REG1_BIT_IEN BIT(5)
>>
>> +#define KXCJK1013_RANGE_2G 0x00
>> +#define KXCJK1013_RANGE_4G 0x01
>> +#define KXCJK1013_RANGE_8G 0x02
> These are effectively used as an enum? Hence I'd make them one.
>
>> +
>> #define KXCJK1013_DATA_MASK_12_BIT 0x0FFF
>> #define KXCJK1013_MAX_STARTUP_TIME_US 100000
>>
>> @@ -86,6 +90,7 @@ struct kxcjk1013_data {
>> struct mutex mutex;
>> s16 buffer[8];
>> u8 odr_bits;
>> + u8 range;
> with an enum above this becomes a little more obvious too.
>> bool active_high_intr;
>> bool trigger_on;
>> };
>> @@ -120,6 +125,14 @@ static const struct {
>> {0x02, 21000}, {0x03, 11000}, {0x04, 6400},
>> {0x05, 3900}, {0x06, 2700}, {0x07, 2100} };
>>
>> +static const struct {
>> + u16 scale;
>> + u8 gsel_0;
>> + u8 gsel_1;
> Could use a bitfield to make it clear these are single bits..
I thought bit fields is not recommended for portability concerns in kernel.
Hence avoided using bit fields.
Thanks,
Srinivas
>> +} KXCJK1013_scale_table[] = { {9582, 0, 0},
>> + {19163, 0, 1},
>> + {38326, 1, 0} };
>> +
> Once the _4G etc defines are an enum, you can explicitly set the values
> in the table using [KXCJK1013_RANGE_2G] = etc
>
>> static int kxcjk1013_set_mode(struct kxcjk1013_data *data,
>> enum kxcjk1013_mode mode)
>> {
>> @@ -190,6 +203,7 @@ static int kxcjk1013_chip_init(struct
>> kxcjk1013_data *data)
>> /* Setting range to 4G */
>> ret |= KXCJK1013_REG_CTRL1_BIT_GSEL0;
>> ret &= ~KXCJK1013_REG_CTRL1_BIT_GSEL1;
>> + data->range = KXCJK1013_RANGE_4G;
> I'd almost be tempted to call the set function here instead of hand
> coding
> this case. I know it will involve more hardware writes, but it will give
> slightly more obviously correct code (one path to set it rather than
> two).
>>
>> /* Set 12 bit mode */
>> ret |= KXCJK1013_REG_CTRL1_BIT_RES;
>> @@ -422,6 +436,59 @@ static int kxcjk1013_get_startup_times(struct
>> kxcjk1013_data *data)
>> return KXCJK1013_MAX_STARTUP_TIME_US;
>> }
>>
>> +static int kxcjk1013_set_scale(struct kxcjk1013_data *data, int val)
>> +{
>> + int ret, i;
>> + enum kxcjk1013_mode store_mode;
>> +
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(KXCJK1013_scale_table); ++i) {
>> + if (KXCJK1013_scale_table[i].scale == val) {
>> +
>> + ret = kxcjk1013_get_mode(data, &store_mode);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + ret = kxcjk1013_set_mode(data, STANDBY);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client,
>> + KXCJK1013_REG_CTRL1);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(&data->client->dev,
>> + "Error reading reg_ctrl1\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret |= (KXCJK1013_scale_table[i].gsel_0 << 3);
>> + ret |= (KXCJK1013_scale_table[i].gsel_1 << 4);
>> +
>> + ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(data->client,
>> + KXCJK1013_REG_CTRL1,
>> + ret);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(&data->client->dev,
>> + "Error writing reg_ctrl1\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + data->range = i;
>> + dev_dbg(&data->client->dev, "New Scale range %d\n", i);
>> +
>> + if (store_mode == OPERATION) {
>> + ret = kxcjk1013_set_mode(data, OPERATION);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int kxcjk1013_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>> struct iio_chan_spec const *chan, int *val,
>> int *val2, long mask)
>> @@ -458,7 +525,7 @@ static int kxcjk1013_read_raw(struct iio_dev
>> *indio_dev,
>>
>> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
>> *val = 0;
>> - *val2 = 19163; /* range +-4g (4/2047*9.806650) */
>> + *val2 = KXCJK1013_scale_table[data->range].scale;
>> return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
>>
>> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
>> @@ -485,6 +552,14 @@ static int kxcjk1013_write_raw(struct iio_dev
>> *indio_dev,
>> ret = kxcjk1013_set_odr(data, val, val2);
>> mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
>> break;
>> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
>> + if (val)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
>> + ret = kxcjk1013_set_scale(data, val2);
>> + mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
>> + break;
>> default:
>> ret = -EINVAL;
>> }
>> @@ -506,8 +581,11 @@ static int kxcjk1013_validate_trigger(struct
>> iio_dev *indio_dev,
>> static IIO_CONST_ATTR_SAMP_FREQ_AVAIL(
>> "0.781000 1.563000 3.125000 6.250000 12.500000 25 50 100 200
>> 400 800 1600");
>>
>> +static IIO_CONST_ATTR(in_accel_scale_available, "0.009582 0.019163
>> 0.038326");
>> +
>> static struct attribute *kxcjk1013_attributes[] = {
>> &iio_const_attr_sampling_frequency_available.dev_attr.attr,
>> + &iio_const_attr_in_accel_scale_available.dev_attr.attr,
>> NULL,
>> };
>>
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-24 23:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-17 0:42 [PATCH 1/6] iio: accel: kxcjk-1013: Fix setting frequency Srinivas Pandruvada
2014-07-17 0:42 ` [PATCH 2/6] iio: accel: kxcjk-1013: Use try_reenable to ack intr Srinivas Pandruvada
2014-07-20 15:20 ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-07-17 0:42 ` [PATCH 3/6] iio: accel: kxcjk-1013: support runtime pm Srinivas Pandruvada
2014-07-20 15:37 ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-07-22 1:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-27 13:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-07-27 14:26 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2014-07-17 0:42 ` [PATCH 4/6] iio: accel: kxcjk-1013: Set adjustable range Srinivas Pandruvada
2014-07-20 15:45 ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-07-24 23:04 ` Srinivas Pandruvada [this message]
2014-07-27 13:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-07-17 0:42 ` [PATCH 5/6] iio: accel: kxcjk-1013: Support thresholds Srinivas Pandruvada
2014-07-20 16:04 ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-07-20 16:34 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2014-07-20 17:01 ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-07-17 0:42 ` [PATCH 6/6] iio: accel: kxcjk-1013: Increment ref counter for indio_dev->trig Srinivas Pandruvada
2014-07-20 11:29 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-07-20 12:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-07-20 15:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-07-20 15:19 ` [PATCH 1/6] iio: accel: kxcjk-1013: Fix setting frequency Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53D190E1.6050504@linux.intel.com \
--to=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).